Adjustable Child Restraint Seat With Inflatable Neck Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Child restraint systems are often rigid and uncomfortable, causing strain on children's necks due to inadequate adjustment and requiring manual adjustment while parked, which is inconvenient and may lead to injuries.

Innovation Solution

An automated adjustable child restraint system with sensors and a remote controller that allows for customizable seating and positioning based on age and weight, featuring inflatable sections for comfort and safety, and voice-activated commands for ease of use, including notifications for the driver.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If child restraint systems are made rigid for safety, then safety is improved, but comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the restraint system adjustable rather than fixed. The seat position, backrest angle, and harness tension can be dynamically modified to suit different children and situations, resolving the contradiction between rigid safety structures and comfortable adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters such as seat position, angle, and tension to optimize both safety and comfort. By adjusting these parameters rather than relying on a fixed rigid structure, the system maintains safety while improving comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment is provided for customization, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to requiring parking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoidadjustment convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with automated motorized actuators. These actuators can adjust the seat position, backrest angle, and harness tension automatically, eliminating the need for the user to manually adjust while parked and allowing adjustments to be made while the vehicle is in motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment through automated actuators that modify the restraint configuration based on preset parameters or sensor input, reducing the need for manual user intervention and enabling adjustments during vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If automated adjustment is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment convenienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses universal actuators and control systems that can perform multiple adjustment functions (seat position, backrest angle, harness tension) with a single integrated mechanism. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate mechanisms for each adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the control of multiple adjustment functions into a single automated control unit that coordinates seat position, angle, and harness tension adjustments together, simplifying the control architecture and reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If fixed position is used for simplicity, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidposition adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms fixed positions into dynamic, adjustable positions using motorized actuators. The system can assume multiple positions and configurations tailored to different children and situations, providing adaptability without significantly increasing complexity through the use of standardized actuator components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a comfortable and safe riding experience by automatically adjusting to accommodate children's needs, preventing neck strain and allowing for easy adjustment without needing to park the vehicle, while ensuring the child's safety and comfort throughout the ride.

Implementation Method 1

featuring inflatable sections for comfort and safety

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInflation:

Data Source

PatentUS11884187B2Adjustable child restraint system
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 FAM FLORA K
  • US11884187B2 patent drawing
  • US11884187B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In at least one embodiment, an adjustable child restraint system is provided. The system may include a base portion, a child retaining portion, a sensor, and a controller operatively connected to the base portion and/or the child retaining portion, the controller for operating movement of the base portion and/or the child retaining portion, in some embodiments. The child retaining portion may include a first expandable section and a second expandable section to operatively expand to support a head and neck of a child seated there within.