Child Seat Abutting Mechanism With Locking and Auto-Reset Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child safety seat adjustment mechanisms are complex, difficult to manufacture, costly, prone to operation failures, and lack automatic resetting, leading to cumbersome adjustment and disassembly processes, with insufficient fixation and support causing the seat to swing during use.

Innovation Solution

An abutting and bearing device with a casing, abutting member, driving assembly, locking assembly, and resetting assembly, allowing for easy extension and retraction of the abutting member to securely fit the child safety seat to the car seat back, featuring a control member for operation and automatic resetting functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a complex adjustment mechanism with multiple components is used to adjust the ejector rod angle, then the fit between the child safety seat and car seat back is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit between child safety seat and car seat backVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment mechanism is divided into independent functional modules: the ejector rod for angle adjustment, the locking member for position fixation, and the driving member for actuation. Each module performs a specific function, allowing for simplified manufacturing and assembly while achieving the desired adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustment function is extracted from the main seat structure and implemented as a separate, dedicated mechanism. This allows the adjustment system to be optimized independently, reducing overall complexity by isolating the adjustment functionality from other seat components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple components with connection and movement cooperation are used for adjustment, then the adjustability is improved, but the ease of manufacture and assembly deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment rangeVSAvoidmanufacturing and assembling difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism uses dynamic elements such as the slidable locking member and the spring-loaded ejector rod that can move along defined paths. This dynamic design provides continuous adjustment range while maintaining simple component geometries that are easy to manufacture using standard machining processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a multi-component adjustment mechanism is used, then the adjustment capability is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to complex operations in multiple directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment capabilityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking and adjustment functions are merged into a single operational sequence. The locking member simultaneously controls both the adjustment position and the locked state, allowing the user to perform adjustment and locking with one continuous action rather than separate operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded ejector rod provides automatic return to the initial position after adjustment. When the locking member is released, the spring automatically resets the ejector rod, eliminating the need for manual resetting operations and simplifying the user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Stability of the object's composition

If the ejector rod angle is adjusted to improve fit, then the seating comfort is improved, but the time required for adjustment and disassembly increases due to lack of automatic resetting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating fitVSAvoidadjustment and disassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded ejector rod automatically returns to its initial retracted position when the locking member is released. This self-resetting feature eliminates the need for manual retraction operations, allowing quick disassembly and readjustment without time-consuming manual interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism is designed for rapid cyclic operation between adjusted and reset states. The spring-loaded reset provides quick periodic return to the initial position, enabling frequent adjustments without significant time loss, thus supporting periodic use patterns typical in child safety seat applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240326663A1Abutting and bearing device and seating device
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 WONDERLAND SWITZERLAND AG
  • US20240326663A1 patent drawing
  • US20240326663A1 patent drawing
  • US20240326663A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An abutting and bearing device and a seating device, wherein the abutting and bearing device includes: a casing; an abutting member disposed in the casing and having an end extending out of the casing, a driving assembly disposed in the casing, and the abutting member being movable so as to be in its extended position or retracted position by the driving assembly; and a control member disposed on the casing for controlling an extension of the abutting member, wherein the abutting and bearing device further includes a locking assembly and a resetting assembly, the locking assembly is used to lock the abutting member when the abutting member is extended, and the resetting assembly is used to reset the abutting member to its retracted position.