Childproof Dropper Cap With Automatic Pipette Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing childproof caps for containers are complex and costly to produce, often requiring expensive manufacturing processes and non-recyclable plastics, and do not provide self-loading features for droppers or pipettes, posing a risk of accidental consumption by children and inefficiency in fluid dispensing.

Innovation Solution

A container system with a removable cap featuring a self-loading mechanism that includes a pliable bulb and a cap system with interlocking teeth, allowing for automatic fluid transfer between the container and pipette through a combination of rotational and linear motions, ensuring childproof safety and recyclable materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex shapes and features (markings, two-part processes) are used for childproof caps, then childproof safety is improved, but manufacturing cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechildproof safetyVSAvoidcap structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cap is divided into two separate parts: an inner cap and an outer cap. The inner cap contains the childproof locking mechanism with teeth that engage with corresponding teeth on the outer cap. This segmentation allows the complex childproofing function to be distributed across simple, separate components rather than requiring a single complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The childproofing function is extracted from the cap body and implemented through a separate locking mechanism consisting of teeth on the inner cap and corresponding teeth on the outer cap. This extraction allows the basic cap structure to remain simple while the childproofing feature is achieved through a dedicated, easily manufacturable mechanical interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If complex shapes and features are used for childproof caps, then childproof safety is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechildproof safetyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of making the entire cap structure complex, the childproofing function is localized to specific features: teeth on the inner cap and corresponding teeth on the outer cap. These localized features provide the necessary childproofing function while keeping the rest of the cap structure simple and inexpensive to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cap components are designed to be made from the same or similar materials (plastic) with similar manufacturing processes. The inner cap and outer cap can both be produced using standard injection molding techniques, avoiding the need for expensive specialized manufacturing processes required by complex integrated designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

3Reliability

If plastic materials are used to produce complex cap shapes, then childproof safety is improved, but environmental sustainability worsens due to non-recyclability and waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechildproof safetyVSAvoidplastic waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cap is designed as a two-part system where the inner cap and outer cap can be separated and recovered. This segmentation facilitates recycling by allowing the components to be processed separately, potentially enabling reuse or recycling of the plastic materials without requiring complex disassembly of integrated structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Ease of operation

If traditional dropper loading mechanisms are used, then fluid dispensing is achieved, but the number of steps required by the user increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading process simplicityVSAvoidtime required for loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cap removal action is merged with the dropper loading action. When the user removes the outer cap from the container, the corresponding teeth interaction simultaneously performs both the cap removal function and the dropper loading function in a single action, eliminating the need for separate steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The dropper automatically loads itself when the outer cap is removed. The teeth interaction that releases the cap also triggers the mechanism that draws fluid into the dropper bulb, allowing the system to perform the loading function without requiring additional user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a cost-effective, recyclable, and childproof solution that simplifies the loading process for droppers and pipettes, reducing the risk of accidental consumption and enhancing operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a bulb (34) that is compressible from a first volume to a smaller second volume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

an automatic suction operation to charge a dropper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS20260015137A1Container system with a removable cap
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 CENTRAL BAG & BURLAP CO
  • US20260015137A1 patent drawing
  • US20260015137A1 patent drawing
  • US20260015137A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Storage and dispensing systems are provided. In various embodiments, systems of the present disclosure provide safety feature to prevent or limit the risk of a child or minor opening the system. Embodiments of the present disclosure further comprise novel cap and closure arrangements including, for example, features that are operable to automatically load or fill a pipette of the system.