Childproof Overcap Torque Transmission for ROPP Closures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Roll-on Pilfer Proof (ROPP) closures do not prevent unauthorized opening, particularly by children, despite providing tamper evidence, as they lack childproof features to secure potentially hazardous contents within bottles.

Innovation Solution

A childproof overcap is designed to be used with ROPP closures, which can be positioned over the closure to selectively transmit torque, requiring specific knowledge to open the bottle, featuring a deflectable top portion and a knurled pattern for engaging the ROPP closure to break the serrated band and open the bottle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a ROPP closure is used to seal a bottle, then the bottle can be selectively opened and closed with tamper evidence, but the closure does not prevent unauthorized opening by children

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper evidence functionalityVSAvoidunauthorized access by children
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The overcap is positioned over the ROPP closure, creating a nested configuration where the overcap encloses the closure. The overcap includes an inwardly extending lower end that nests within the ROPP closure structure to secure it in place. This nesting arrangement adds a childproof barrier while maintaining the underlying ROPP closure's tamper evidence functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The closure system is divided into separate functional components: the ROPP closure provides tamper evidence through the pilfer band and serrated band, while the overcap provides childproof protection through its engagement features. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one protective function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If an overcap is added to provide childproof protection, then unauthorized access is prevented, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunauthorized access preventionVSAvoidclosure assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The overcap includes a deflectable top portion that can move between engaged and disengaged positions. When force is applied, the top portion deflects to allow the inwardly extending lower end to engage with the ROPP closure. This dynamic feature enables simple manual operation while maintaining a secure locked state, reducing the perceived complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The overcap is formed from a flexible material that allows the top portion to deflect during engagement and disengagement. This flexibility enables the overcap to accommodate the engagement features of the ROPP closure without requiring complex mechanical components, simplifying the overall structure while maintaining childproof functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the overcap requires specific knowledge to open, then childproof protection is enhanced, but the ease of operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechildproof protectionVSAvoidopening process
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The overcap engagement system is designed to be self-explanatory through its physical structure. The inwardly extending lower end and deflectable top portion create a natural engagement mechanism that users can understand and operate without special instructions. The mechanical interaction provides tactile feedback that guides the user through the opening process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The overcap is pre-positioned in an engaged state during bottling, requiring the user to perform the disengagement action. The deflectable top portion is pre-configured to move when force is applied, automatically transitioning from the locked to unlocked state. This preliminary positioning maintains childproof protection while simplifying the user action to a single pulling motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11214411B2Childproof tamper evident closure assembly
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 BALL CORP
  • US11214411B2 patent drawing
  • US11214411B2 patent drawing
  • US11214411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and apparatuses for sealing bottles with a Roll-on Pilfer Proof (ROPP) closure and a childproof overcap are provided. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to an overcap that can be placed onto or formed onto the ROPP closure. The overcap has a retainer that secures the overcap to the ROPP closure and allows the overcap to move relative to the ROPP closure in a longitudinal axis. The overcap moves between a first position or mode of operation where the overcap can rotate about the ROPP closure and a second position or mode of operation where the overcap engages the ROPP closure to transmit a twisting or torque force to the ROPP closure and open the bottle.