Chiller Plant Performance Monitoring via Heat Rejection Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chiller plant performance evaluation methods are inefficient due to the lack of adequate instrumentation and data collection systems, leading to complex and costly measurements that are not regularly consulted, and existing methods focus solely on compressor components without evaluating the entire chiller plant effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method using fewer points of instrumentation to determine chiller performance by measuring the heat rejected by the chiller, employing a computerized analyzer with programmable logic controllers to calculate refrigeration load and efficiency in real-time, allowing for real-time comparisons and customized modeling based on actual operating conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional performance evaluation methods are used with comprehensive instrumentation, then measurement accuracy is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance measurement accuracyVSAvoidinstrumentation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential measurement parameters needed for chiller performance evaluation, specifically focusing on heat rejection measurements rather than comprehensive monitoring of all system parameters. This selective extraction reduces instrumentation complexity while maintaining measurement accuracy for the critical performance metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a modeled representation of chiller performance based on heat rejection data, creating a simplified copy of the complex thermal processes. This modeling approach allows accurate performance evaluation without requiring direct measurement of all intermediate thermal parameters, thereby reducing instrumentation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If comprehensive data collection systems are implemented, then information completeness is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in consulting and analyzing the data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance information completenessVSAvoiddata analysis ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses on the single most critical performance indicator - heat rejection - rather than collecting and analyzing comprehensive datasets. This extraction approach maintains essential performance information while dramatically simplifying data analysis and interpretation for operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter being measured from multiple operational parameters to a single heat rejection parameter. This parameter transformation simplifies the information structure, making it easier to consult and analyze while retaining the ability to evaluate chiller performance effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If kW/ton measurement method is used, then performance evaluation is simplified, but reliability deteriorates due to variability from operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation method simplicityVSAvoidperformance measurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from kW/ton (which varies with operating conditions) to heat rejection, which provides a more stable and reliable basis for performance evaluation. This parameter change maintains evaluation simplicity while improving reliability by reducing sensitivity to varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a measurement approach that provides direct feedback on heat rejection, enabling more reliable performance assessment. This feedback mechanism allows for better comparison against benchmarks and improved reliability in evaluating chiller performance across different operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are deployed throughout the chiller plant, then measurement precision is improved, but manufacturing precision and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational parameter measurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem implementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential measurement need down to a single heat rejection measurement point, eliminating the requirement for multiple sensors throughout the plant. This extraction approach maintains sufficient measurement precision for performance evaluation while dramatically reducing implementation cost and manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the heat rejection measurement serve multiple evaluation purposes simultaneously, replacing the need for multiple specialized sensors for different parameters. This multi-functionality approach maintains comprehensive performance monitoring capability while reducing the total number of measurement devices required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides real-time performance evaluation with reduced instrumentation costs, enabling effective comparison and optimization of chiller plant operations, and allows for customized algorithms to determine refrigeration load and efficiency, promoting energy savings through condenser water reset control.

Implementation Method 1

The refrigeration process of cooling the CHW creates heat that is rejected into a separate cooling fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

Heat is removed from the CW by a cooling tower before it is returned to the chiller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporative Cooler

Data Source

PatentUS10161834B1Method to determine performance of a chiller and chiller plant
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 HENRY WILLIAM R
  • US10161834B1 patent drawing
  • US10161834B1 patent drawing
  • US10161834B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A chiller and chiller plant monitoring method that provides real time performance and benchmark parameters using condenser water temperatures and flow rates to determine crucial performance metrics. A customized chiller model developed with algorithms to make comparative analysis for different operating scenarios. By applying a customized model for the supporting equipment, the entire plant can be monitored for performance. Actual operational metrics are compared with bench mark models to provide real time analysis of energy demand. The model also produces a control formula for condenser water reset. And defining the plant as a chilled water production system separate from the distribution system allows comparison with many with dissimilar operations.