Chip Cooling via Gas-Liquid Vaporization Chamber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cooling systems for microprocessor chips, whether air-cooled or liquid-cooled, face inefficiencies and space constraints, with liquid-cooled systems being prone to leaks and associated risks.

Innovation Solution

A gas/vapor cooling system that employs a vaporization chamber to partially vaporize a liquid stream before it enters a small heat sink, utilizing the mixture of gas, vapor, and liquid to efficiently transfer heat, minimizing space requirements and leakage risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If air-cooled systems use large fins and thick bases to maximize heat transfer area, then heat transfer efficiency is improved, but the system size increases and occupies up to 25% of enclosure space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidcooling system volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies phase transition by vaporizing liquid into gas within the cooling system. The liquid is converted to vapor phase to enhance heat transfer efficiency, allowing for more effective cooling without requiring large physical dimensions. This phase change enables high heat transfer coefficients in a compact configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes fluid dynamics by circulating liquid through channels and using the phase change from liquid to gas to drive the cooling process. The pneumatic-hydraulic system allows for efficient heat removal in a compact design, avoiding the need for large fins and bases required in conventional air-cooled systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Volume of stationary object

If liquid-cooled systems use smaller fins and thinner bases to reduce space, then space efficiency is improved, but the systems become susceptible to leaks and potential damage to electronics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling system volumeVSAvoidleakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs phase transition from liquid to gas to resolve the leakage risk. By vaporizing the liquid coolant, the system eliminates the free liquid phase that causes leakage problems. The vaporized coolant circulates without the gravitational flow issues and leakage susceptibility of liquid systems, while maintaining efficient heat transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state parameter of the coolant from liquid to gas phase. This parameter change fundamentally alters the behavior of the coolant, eliminating leakage risks associated with liquid systems while maintaining the compact design advantages. The phase change enables the system to achieve both small size and high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If liquid-cooled systems are designed to be more efficient at transporting heat, then heat transfer efficiency is improved, but the systems require liquid handling infrastructure that increases complexity and leakage risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transport efficiencyVSAvoidliquid handling infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses phase transition to simplify the system by eliminating complex liquid handling infrastructure. The liquid is vaporized and circulated as gas, which requires simpler containment and handling. This phase change approach maintains high heat transport efficiency while reducing the complexity of pumps, seals, and leak-prevention mechanisms required in traditional liquid-cooled systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves efficient cooling with reduced space demands and lower risk of leakage, maintaining performance comparable to liquid-cooled systems while minimizing the risks associated with liquid-based cooling.

Implementation Method 1

a vaporization chamber for at least partially vaporizing a stream of liquid in a stream of gas to produce a mixture of gas, vapor and liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

a heat sink coupled to the vaporization chamber for transferring heat from the heat-generating device to the mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS8037926B2Method and apparatus for chip cooling
Publication Date: 2011.10.18 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US8037926B2 patent drawing
  • US8037926B2 patent drawing
  • US8037926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, the invention is a method and apparatus for chip cooling. One embodiment of a system for cooling a heat-generating device, such as a semiconductor chip, includes a vaporization chamber for at least partially vaporizing a stream of liquid in a stream of a gas to produce a mixture of gas, vapor and liquid and a heat sink coupled to the vaporization chamber for transferring heat from the heat-generating device to the mixture.