Semiconductor Chip Corner Thinning for Adhesive Interface Stress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor devices face reliability issues during temperature cycle tests due to stress at the interface between the semiconductor chip and conductive adhesive material, leading to thermal resistance defects, with existing solutions either compromising flexural strength or increasing ON-resistance.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves forming thin portions at the corner portions of the semiconductor chip, which are thinner than the rest of the chip, to reduce stress at the interface with the conductive adhesive material, thereby preventing cracks and maintaining flexural strength while minimizing ON-resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the thickness of the semiconductor chip is reduced to reduce stress at the interface, then the stress at the interface is reduced, but the flexural strength of the semiconductor chip decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface stress resistanceVSAvoidflexural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by forming thin portions only at the corner portions of the semiconductor chip where stress concentrates during temperature cycle tests. The thickness of these thin portions is smaller than the thickness of the main body, creating a local stress relief zone without compromising the overall structural integrity and flexural strength of the chip. This selective thinning addresses the interface stress problem only where it is most critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the thickness of the conductive adhesive material is increased to reduce stress at the interface, then the stress at the interface is reduced, but the ON-resistance of the semiconductor device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface stress resistanceVSAvoidON-resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the stress relief function at the corner portions through thin portions, rather than uniformly increasing the conductive adhesive material thickness across the entire chip. This localized approach reduces stress only where needed at the corners, avoiding the need to increase adhesive thickness elsewhere, thereby preventing ON-resistance increase while still improving interface stress resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the thickness of the semiconductor chip is reduced to reduce stress at the interface, then the stress at the interface is reduced, but the risk of wafer cracking during transportation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface stress resistanceVSAvoidwafer cracking risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by forming thin portions only at the corner portions of the semiconductor chip where stress concentrates during temperature cycle tests. The thickness of these thin portions is smaller than the thickness of the main body, creating a local stress relief zone without compromising the overall structural integrity and flexural strength of the chip. This selective thinning addresses the interface stress problem only where it is most critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240006344A1Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US20240006344A1 patent drawing
  • US20240006344A1 patent drawing
  • US20240006344A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device includes a chip mounting portion and a semiconductor chip provided on the chip mounting portion via a conductive adhesive material. Here, a planar shape of the semiconductor chip is a quadrangular shape. Also, in plan view, a plurality of thin portions is formed at a plurality of corner portions of the semiconductor chip, respectively. Also, the plurality of thin portions respectively formed at the plurality of corner portions of the semiconductor chip is spaced apart from each other. Further, thickness of each of the plurality of thin portions is smaller than a thickness of the semiconductor chip other than the plurality of the thin portions.