Chip IO Design Optimizing Layout Area and Pin Count

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chip IO design technologies fail to effectively minimize chip layout area and cost while addressing simultaneous switching noise (SSN) by not considering geometric locations of signal IO cells and parasite effects of the chip package and circuit board, leading to over-design and increased pin count.

Innovation Solution

A method for chip IO design that integrates signal IO pin sequence, timing specifications, and physical layout parameters to optimize the placement of signal IO cells and IO supply cells, using numerical simulations to verify SSO specifications and adjust driving parameters, including the addition of decoupling capacitors and IO supply cells as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional IO design methods are used without considering geometric locations and parasite effects, then design process is simpler, but chip layout area increases and pin count increases due to over-design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign process simplicityVSAvoidchip layout area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary numerical simulations during the design phase to calculate SSO impacts by integrating geometric locations of signal IO cells and parasite effects of chip package and circuit board. This preliminary analysis enables optimized placement of signal IO cells and determination of minimum required IO supply cells before manufacturing, avoiding over-design and reducing chip layout area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional IO design methods are used without considering geometric locations and parasite effects, then design process is simpler, but pin count increases due to over-design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign process simplicityVSAvoidpin count
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary numerical simulations during the design phase to calculate SSO impacts by integrating geometric locations of signal IO cells and parasite effects of chip package and circuit board. This preliminary analysis enables optimized placement of signal IO cells and determination of minimum required IO supply cells before manufacturing, avoiding over-design and reducing pin count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses numerical simulations to create a virtual model of the chip's electrical behavior, copying real-world parasite effects and SSO impacts in a computational environment. This virtual modeling allows accurate prediction of voltage drops and noise without physical prototypes, enabling precise determination of required IO supply cells and reducing unnecessary pins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Area of stationary object

If geometric locations and parasite effects are considered in IO design, then chip layout area is minimized and pin count is reduced, but design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip layout areaVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual design iterations and physical prototyping with numerical simulations that computationally model electrical behavior. By substituting mechanical/design complexity with automated computational analysis, the system achieves precise optimization of chip layout and pin count while managing design complexity through software-based approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Quantity of substance

If geometric locations and parasite effects are considered in IO design, then pin count is minimized, but design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepin countVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual design iterations and physical prototyping with numerical simulations that computationally model electrical behavior. By substituting manual design complexity with automated computational analysis, the system achieves precise determination of minimum required pins while managing design complexity through software-based approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8997032B2Method for input/output design of chip
Publication Date: 2015.03.31 GLOBAL UNICHIP CORPORATION
  • US8997032B2 patent drawing
  • US8997032B2 patent drawing
  • US8997032B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for input/output (IO) design of a chip, including: according to a signal IO pin sequence and associated driving parameters, sequentially placing a signal IO cell in the IO design associated with each of the signal IO pins; after a signal IO cell is placed, performing a simultaneous switching output (SSO) verification step according to physical layout parameters and locations of the signal IO cells placed in the IO design, so as to check whether an SSO specification is violated; if not violated, continuing to place a signal IO cell of a next signal IO pin; if violated, including a decoupling capacitor, an IO power cell and/or an IO ground cell in the IO design.