Identifying Defective Chip Readers via Fallback Transaction Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

EMV-chip cards and chip readers often experience intermittent failures due to manufacturing defects, wear, or breakage, leading to substandard transaction experiences and increased reliance on magnetic strip transactions, which are less secure.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing chip card transactions to identify defective EMV-chip cards and chip readers by tracking transaction data, calculating fallback transaction percentages, and recommending replacement when thresholds are exceeded, thereby improving transaction reliability and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If EMV-chip cards are used instead of magnetic strip cards, then transaction security is improved, but device reliability deteriorates due to manufacturing defects, wear, or breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoiddevice reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of defective chip cards and chip readers by analyzing historical transaction data and fallback transaction patterns before problems escalate. By proactively identifying defective devices through data analysis and comparing fallback rates against thresholds, the system enables preventive replacement, thereby maintaining both security and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If chip readers are deployed at merchants, then transaction security is improved, but device reliability deteriorates due to intermittent failures and defective readers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidchip reader reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes a feedback loop by continuously monitoring transaction data and fallback transaction rates from chip readers across the network. When fallback rates exceed predetermined thresholds, the system identifies defective readers and triggers replacement actions. This feedback mechanism ensures that security is maintained while reliability issues are systematically addressed through data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If fallback transactions are used when chip transactions fail, then transaction continuity is maintained, but security is compromised due to reliance on magnetic strip transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction continuityVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively identifies defective chip cards and readers before they cause security compromises through fallback transactions. By analyzing transaction patterns and identifying devices with high failure rates, the system enables preventive replacement, thereby maintaining transaction continuity through reliable EMV-chip transactions rather than forcing insecure fallback to magnetic strip transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10776589B2System and computer-implemented method for identifying defective chip readers through substandard transaction experiences
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US10776589B2 patent drawing
  • US10776589B2 patent drawing
  • US10776589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and computer-implemented method for analyzing chip card transactions to identify defective chip cards and/or defective chip readers in need of replacement. Constraints are established to define a subset of card transactions. From a full set of card transactions the subset is identified consisting of each card transaction falling within the constraints and occurring at a merchant having a chip reader. From this subset the unique chip readers are identified, and for each unique chip reader a percentage of fallback transactions is calculated. The percentage of fallback transactions is compared to a maximum value, and if the percentage of fallback transactions exceeds the maximum value, the chip reader is identified as defective. Each defective chip reader is reported to the merchant, along with at least a recommendation to replace the defective chip reader. A similar process may be used to identify defective chip cards.