Chirp Signal Detection Interference Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Interference signals, particularly those with frequencies similar to chirp signals, complicate the detection of chirp signals in bus systems, leading to synchronization issues during data transmission, especially in power line systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that record and process input signals by calculating a correlation with a chirp reference signal, synthesizing an interference signal, and subtracting it to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, allowing reliable detection of chirp signals despite interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If correlation detection is used to detect chirp signals, then synchronization capability is improved, but detection reliability deteriorates when interference signals have similar frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechirp signal detection reliabilityVSAvoidinterference signal impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful interference signal into a beneficial component by synthesizing an interference signal from the input signal's magnitude and phase characteristics, then subtracting it to reveal the chirp signal. The interference that initially hindered detection is transformed into a removable component that, when eliminated, improves detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate processing steps between the raw input signal and chirp detection: magnitude calculation, phase difference calculation, interference signal synthesis, and subtraction. These intermediary operations separate the chirp signal from the interference by processing them through different mathematical transformations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If signal processing steps are added to suppress interference, then detection reliability is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechirp signal detection reliabilityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the interference signal synthesis self-service by deriving it directly from the input signal's own magnitude and phase characteristics. The system uses the input signal's inherent properties to generate its own interference model, eliminating the need for external interference models or additional reference signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the signal processing approach by changing parameters from direct correlation to magnitude calculation, phase difference calculation, and synthesized signal subtraction. This parameter transformation simplifies the mathematical operations while maintaining interference suppression effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively suppresses interference signals, ensuring robust data transmission and synchronization between transmitters and receivers, even when interference frequencies match the chirp signal, and is computationally efficient for real-time applications.

Implementation Method 1

calculating an output signal as a correlation from the recorded input signal and a chirp reference signal using a correlator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCorrelation:

Implementation Method 2

a synthesized noise signal is then calculated. This signal is derived from the magnitude of the input signal, the magnitude of the output signal, and the phase difference between the input and output signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal synthesis:

Implementation Method 3

A residual signal is then calculated. This residual signal is determined by subtracting the output signal from the synthesized noise signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal subtraction:

Data Source

PatentEP3714548B1Method and system for interference reduction by the detection of a chirp signal
Publication Date: 2021.11.03 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3714548B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3714548B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3714548B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for suppressing an interference signal during detection of a chirp signal from an input signal (X), comprising the following steps: a. recording the input signal (X); b. calculating an output signal (R1) as a correlation from the recorded input signal (X) and a chirp reference signal (CR) by means of a correlator (30); c. calculating a magnitude (XB) of the input signal (X) from the input signal (X); d. calculating a magnitude (R1B) of the output signal (R1) from the output signal (R1); e. calculating a phase difference (P) between the input signal (X) and the output signal (R1); f. calculating a synthesised interference signal (R2) from the magnitude (XB) of the input signal (X), the magnitude (R1B) of the output signal (R1) and the phase difference (P) by means of a rotator (60); g. calculating a residual signal (DR) as the difference between the output signal (R1) and the synthesised interference signal (R2). The invention relates to a system (10) for suppressing an interference signal during detection of a chirp signal by means of the method according to the invention.