Chirp Networks for Secure IoT Edge Connectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network protocols for IoT devices are inefficient, costly, and insecure, particularly in scenarios requiring global-scale, intermittent connectivity, which limits the deployment of IoT on a massive scale.

Innovation Solution

A scalable, extensible, and innately secure network architecture and protocol that utilizes simple devices with minimal firmware, leveraging Globally Ubiquitous intermittent connectivity, and employs a receiver-oriented messaging system inspired by nature, with chirp-like messages that are terse, cryptic, and securely transmitted.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current network protocols are used for IoT devices, then devices can communicate, but the system becomes inefficient, costly, and insecure, limiting massive scale deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the complex protocol stack from edge devices, retaining only minimal firmware necessary for chirp transmission. Full networking functionality is extracted to intermediate propagator devices and cloud services, enabling simple devices to communicate securely without burdening them with complex protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate propagator devices as mediators between simple edge devices and cloud services. These propagators handle protocol translation, security management, and data routing, allowing minimal devices to communicate securely through a trusted intermediary layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If full network protocol stacks are installed in edge devices, then communication reliability is improved, but device cost and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts power-intensive protocol processing from edge devices to intermediate propagators and cloud services. Edge devices only perform simple chirp transmission, consuming minimal power, while complex networking functions are performed by powered intermediaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of putting intelligence and processing power at the edge, the patent inverts the architecture by placing smart networking functions at the cloud and intermediate layers, allowing dumb edge devices to communicate efficiently with minimal power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If current protocol stacks are used in IoT devices, then communication functionality is achieved, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication functionalityVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts expensive protocol stack components from edge devices, leaving only minimal firmware. The cost-intensive networking functionality is extracted to intermediate propagators and cloud services, dramatically reducing the cost of simple edge devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the use of extremely simple, low-cost edge devices with minimal firmware that can be easily manufactured and deployed. These cheap devices offload all complex functions to intermediaries, achieving cost reduction while maintaining communication functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Device complexity

If simple chirp protocols are used at network edges, then device cost and complexity are reduced, but network control and flexibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge device complexityVSAvoidnetwork control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediate propagator devices as intelligent mediators that receive simple chirps from edge devices, translate them into appropriate network protocols, and route them to cloud services. This intermediary layer provides full network control and flexibility without complicating edge devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts network control and flexibility functions from edge devices to intermediate propagators and cloud services. Edge devices remain simple while the system maintains full adaptability through intelligent intermediaries that manage routing, translation, and protocol selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250097303A1Chirp networks
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 CHIRP NETWORKS INC
  • US20250097303A1 patent drawing
  • US20250097303A1 patent drawing
  • US20250097303A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for orchestrating chirp-based communication in a distributed network is described. It includes configuring edge devices with imprinted chirp patterns, channels, and schedules derived from an orchestration source. The system and method also include segmenting collision domains in time, frequency, and spatial dimensions to ensure efficient and equitable use of shared communication resources. The system and method use propagator nodes to aggregate, filter, and forward chirp messages to cloud systems while preserving cryptic and minimalistic payloads and adjusts timing dynamically based on network conditions, application relevance windows, and power constraints.