Chirp-Based Over-the-Air Localization Without CSI Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing distributed localization techniques in wireless sensor networks face challenges in privacy preservation, latency, power efficiency, spectral efficiency, and computational complexity, particularly in low-complexity IoT sensors, without addressing these issues simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

An over-the-air computation (OAC) approach using circularly-shifted chirp (CSC) signals for privacy-preserving localization, which allows anchor nodes to transmit votes simultaneously without requiring channel state information (CSI) or perfect time synchronization, enabling non-coherent energy detection and iterative refinement to enhance localization accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional distributed localization techniques are used, then localization functionality is achieved, but privacy preservation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy preservationVSAvoidlocalization functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary computation layer where localization results are computed at intermediate nodes rather than requiring direct data collection from sensors. This mediator approach allows localization functionality to be maintained while preserving sensor data privacy, as only aggregated results rather than raw sensor information are processed and transmitted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical data collection and processing mechanisms with computational techniques that perform localization calculations directly in the signal domain. This substitution allows the system to achieve localization functionality without the need for centralized data collection, thereby preserving privacy while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If data is stored at target nodes for localization, then localization accuracy is improved, but storage overhead increases and privacy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization accuracyVSAvoidstorage overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the storage requirement from target nodes by performing localization computations at intermediate nodes or in a distributed manner. This extraction eliminates the need for target nodes to store all local data, reducing storage overhead while maintaining localization accuracy through the extracted computational results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the localization computation process into multiple stages performed at different nodes. Instead of requiring all data to be stored at a single target node, the computation is divided and executed distributedly, reducing the storage burden on any single node while preserving overall localization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If cryptographic encryption is used for privacy preservation, then privacy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy preservationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes complex cryptographic encryption mechanisms with simpler signal processing techniques that achieve privacy preservation through the natural properties of the communication channel and distributed computation. This replacement maintains privacy preservation while significantly reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to achieve privacy preservation through its inherent distributed computation structure and signal processing capabilities, rather than requiring additional cryptographic layers. The system serves its own privacy protection needs through the natural characteristics of the localization computation process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If computation complexity increases with number of nodes, then localization robustness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization robustnessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple computation operations into a single integrated process that leverages the distributed nature of the network. By combining localization computations at intermediate nodes and aggregating results efficiently, the system achieves robustness proportional to the number of nodes while keeping processing time manageable through parallel computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computations at intermediate nodes before final aggregation, pre-processing localization data to reduce the complexity of subsequent operations. This preliminary action distributes the computational burden and reduces overall processing time while maintaining robustness through the accumulated results from multiple nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Productivity

If OFDM transmissions are used for OAC, then distributed learning is enabled, but peak-to-mean envelope power ratio increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistributed learning capabilityVSAvoidpeak-to-mean envelope power ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the signal modulation parameters from traditional OFDM to a different waveform that maintains the distributed learning capabilities of OAC while controlling the peak-to-mean envelope power ratio. This parameter change preserves productivity for distributed learning while improving power efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12568357B2Chirp-based over-the-air computation for privacy-preserving distributed localization
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
  • US12568357B2 patent drawing
  • US12568357B2 patent drawing
  • US12568357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure deals with method and system for an over-the-air computation (OAC) approach for privacy-preserving localization in a sensor network. The disclosed approach relies on a voting-based distributed localization and the computation of the majority votes (MVs) with OAC. In this method, the anchor node (AN)'s votes encoding the potential location of a server node (SN) are mapped to a circularly-shifted chirp (CSC) signal and all AN simultaneously transmit their CSC signals. The aggregated signal is received at the SN and the MV votes are detected non-coherently without requiring an ideal time-synchronization or channel state information (CSI). We further disclose an iterative refinement procedure to increase the localization performance. The CSCs result in spectral-efficient and power-efficient transmission, while disclosed iterative refinements and repetitions decrease the gap between the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and the quantization bound.