Chlorinator Retrofit Assembly Cap Removal Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pool chlorinator cover assemblies become difficult to remove due to O-ring deterioration from the chlorine gas environment, making it hard to add chlorine tablets.

Innovation Solution

A retrofit assembly with a cylindrical disk portion, flange, upper cylindrical member, collar, and cap with internal threads and radially extending wings for easy manual removal, using chlorine-resistant materials and O-rings to maintain sealing without disturbing the first O-ring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional cover assembly with a single O-ring is used to seal the chlorinator, then the seal prevents escape of chlorine gases, but the O-ring deteriorates due to exposure to chlorine gas making removal difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidease of removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is segmented into two separate O-rings: a first O-ring that remains in the chlorinator body and a second O-ring that moves with the cap. This segmentation allows the stationary first O-ring to maintain the seal while the movable second O-ring facilitates easy cap removal without disturbing the primary seal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The problematic O-ring that causes removal difficulty is extracted from the sealing function. The second O-ring is placed in a recess of the cap rather than being part of the main sealing interface, allowing it to be removed or compressed during cap removal without affecting the primary seal maintained by the first O-ring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the cap is tightly sealed with an O-ring to prevent chlorine gas escape, then the seal is effective, but the O-ring deterioration makes it hard to remove the cap for adding chlorine tablets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal integrityVSAvoidtime to remove cap
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing system is divided into two independent O-ring components with different functions. The first O-ring in the chlorinator body maintains the primary seal, while the second O-ring in the cap recess provides secondary sealing that can be easily compromised during removal, enabling quick cap opening without damaging the main seal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If a simple cap design is used, then the device is easy to manufacture, but it lacks features for easy manual removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmanual removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cap is designed with asymmetric radially extending wings that protrude from the cap body. These wings provide grip surfaces for manual rotation and removal, making the otherwise simple cap design easy to operate while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The radially extending wings act as an intermediary between the user's hand and the cap, providing mechanical advantage for rotation. This simple structural addition mediates between the simple cap design and the need for easy manual removal without complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables easy addition of chlorine tablets without disturbing the seal between the chlorinator and the retrofit assembly, improving the ease of cap removal and reducing O-ring replacement issues.

Implementation Method 1

The first O-ring forms a seal between the lower region and the chlorinator cylinder so as to prevent escape of harmful chlorine gases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing:

Implementation Method 2

The second O-ring forms a seal between the cap and the upper cylindrical member so as to prevent escape of harmful chlorine gases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing:

Implementation Method 3

The internal threads dimensioned for engagement with the exterior threads of the upper cylindrical member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreaded engagement: Screw

Implementation Method 4

a flange at the top of the lower region dimensioned to abut a periphery of said cylindrical opening of the chlorinator cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbutting: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11193290B2Retrofit assembly for a chlorinator
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 CHAMPION POOL PROD LLC
  • US11193290B2 patent drawing
  • US11193290B2 patent drawing
  • US11193290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retrofit assembly for a chlorinator has a cylindrical disk portion having a lower region for insertion into a cylindrical opening of a chlorinator cylinder, a groove for receipt of a first O-ring and a flange at the top to abut the cylindrical opening, and an upper cylindrical member attached to the lower region having exterior threads thereon, a central bore passing through the cylindrical disk portion for passage of chlorine tablets into the chlorinator cylinder, a cylindrical collar with threads for engagement with threads on the chlorinator cylinder, the collar configured to fit over the lower region of the cylindrical disk portion, and a cap having a cylindrical section with internal threads for engagement with the exterior threads of the upper cylindrical member to cover the central bore of the upper cylindrical member, wherein a recess formed in the cap has a bottom for receipt of a second O-ring.