Dynamic Acid Molar Excess Control for Chlorine Dioxide Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for generating chlorine dioxide using the chlorite-acid process incur high costs due to the requirement of a three-fold molar excess of acid, which is not optimized for varying reaction temperatures and times, leading to inefficient chemical usage in large-scale disinfection applications.

Innovation Solution

A method where the reaction temperature in a reactor is determined, and the molar excess of acid relative to chlorite is adjusted based on this temperature, reducing the acid requirement from three moles per mole of chlorite to two moles per mole, thereby reducing chemical costs while maintaining a yield of at least 85% chlorine dioxide.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a three-fold molar excess of acid is used relative to chlorite, then the yield of chlorine dioxide is ensured to be at least 85%, but the chemical costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of chlorine dioxideVSAvoidamount of acid used
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the molar excess of acid variable rather than fixed. The control unit adjusts the acid-to-chlorite ratio in real-time based on reaction conditions (temperature, reaction time, plant utilization), allowing the system to adapt and optimize chemical usage while maintaining the required 85% yield threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of acid molar excess from a static value (3-fold) to a dynamic parameter that varies with reaction temperature and time. By adjusting this parameter according to actual reaction conditions, the system achieves cost reduction while maintaining product yield within the required range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a fixed three-fold molar excess of acid is used, then the process is simple to operate, but chemical costs are unnecessarily high under varying reaction conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidamount of acid used
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control where the control unit continuously monitors reaction conditions (temperature, reaction time) and adjusts the acid dosing accordingly. This closed-loop system maintains operational simplicity through automated control while optimizing chemical consumption based on actual process conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically modifying the acid-to-chlorite ratio based on monitored reaction parameters. The control unit independently optimizes chemical usage without requiring manual intervention, making the process both operationally simple and chemically efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If the molar excess of acid is reduced below three-fold, then chemical costs decrease, but the yield of chlorine dioxide may fall below the required 85%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of acid usedVSAvoidyield of chlorine dioxide
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the acid molar excess based on reaction temperature and time, ensuring the yield remains at or above 85% while minimizing acid consumption. The control unit calculates the optimal ratio in real-time, preventing yield degradation even when using less than the conventional three-fold excess.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the acid molar excess parameter from a fixed low value to a dynamically optimized value, the system achieves both cost reduction and yield assurance. The parameter is adjusted according to reaction conditions to maintain the 85% yield threshold while reducing overall acid consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces chemical costs by approximately €40,000 per year without compromising the target yield, ensuring reliable disinfection in industrial and municipal water treatments by optimizing acid usage with varying reaction conditions.

Implementation Method 1

an acid, a chlorite and optionally water are introduced into a reactor... in which an acid reacts with a chlorite to form chlorine dioxide (ClO2) and a chloride

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3760590B1Method for producing chlorine dioxide
Publication Date: 2023.03.22 PROMINENT GMBH
  • EP3760590B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3760590B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3760590B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

To provide a method that significantly reduces the costs associated with conventional chlorine dioxide production processes using the chlorite-acid method, the invention proposes a process in which an acid, a chlorite, and optionally water are introduced into a reactor. In this process, the reaction temperature in the reactor is determined, and the amount of acid, chlorite, and/or water introduced into the reactor is selected such that the acid is introduced with a molar excess relative to the chlorite introduced into the reactor. The magnitude of this molar excess is varied according to the determined reaction temperature. Furthermore, the present invention relates to an apparatus suitable for carrying out the process according to the invention.