Chlorosilane Reactor Abrasion Resistance via Ceramic Cement Lining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fluidized bed reactors used for producing trichlorosilane suffer from severe abrasive stress due to the hardness of silicon particles, leading to short reactor uptime and high maintenance costs, as existing abrasion-resistant materials like nickel and hard metal coatings are costly and difficult to implement.

Innovation Solution

A steel reactor shell with an inner wall lined with expanded metal and a cement mixture containing ceramic particles, such as silicon carbide, provides enhanced abrasion resistance, extending reactor lifetime and reducing maintenance costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If conventional metallic reactor walls are used, then the reactor structure is simple and成本低, but the reactor suffers from severe abrasive wear leading to short uptime of 36 weeks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor uptimeVSAvoidreactor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor wall is constructed as a composite structure with a metallic base material providing structural strength and a cementitious coating containing ceramic particles (such as silicon carbide) providing abrasion resistance. This composite approach combines the advantages of both materials to achieve both structural integrity and wear resistance, extending reactor uptime to over 65 weeks while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If nickel or hard metal coatings are applied to protect against abrasion, then wear resistance is improved, but the cost and difficulty of implementation increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasion resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using expensive nickel or hard metal coatings that are difficult to apply and remove, the invention uses a cementitious coating with ceramic particles that is cheaper to manufacture and apply. The coating can be easily applied as a slurry and cured in place, and when worn out, can be removed and replaced without specialized equipment, significantly reducing manufacturing and maintenance costs while providing adequate abrasion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameters by using ceramic particles (such as silicon carbide) with high hardness and abrasion resistance embedded in a cement matrix. This combination provides the necessary wear protection while maintaining ease of application and removal, achieving both reliability and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of stationary object

If the reactor wall is made more abrasion-resistant, then reactor lifetime is extended to 65 weeks, but the complexity of the wall structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor lifetimeVSAvoidwall structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor wall uses a composite structure combining metallic base material with a cementitious coating containing ceramic particles. This composite approach provides enhanced abrasion resistance extending reactor lifetime to 65 weeks while maintaining relatively simple construction methods and structure, avoiding the need for complex specialized materials or multi-layer systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ceramic-lined reactor shell increases operational life by a factor of four, making maintenance easier and less expensive, with the mortar layer lasting up to 65 weeks and the reactor components usable for at least 12 years without replacement.

Implementation Method 1

the walls of the fluidized bed reactors are subjected to severe abrasive stress by the fluidized silicon particles during preparation of TCS

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

The cement layer is in each case applied to a honeycomb metallic anchoring structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWear: Wear

Data Source

PatentUS10647583B2Fluidized bed reactor for preparing chlorosilanes
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 WACKER CHEMIE AG

AI summary

The lifetime of a fluidized bed reactor containing silicon particles, for the production of chlorosilanes is greatly extended by armoring at least a portion of the reactor shell interior wall with expanded metal coated with a cement containing ceramic particles.