Chlorosilane Fluidized Bed Reactor Process Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for producing chlorosilanes in fluidized bed reactors are costly and energy-intensive, with low temperature conversion processes requiring complex reaction parameter management and lacking efficient real-time monitoring capabilities, leading to suboptimal productivity and selectivity.

Innovation Solution

A process optimizing reactor design, contact mass constitution, and reaction conditions using dimensionless indices K1, K2, and K3, enabling predictive process control and integrated monitoring through soft sensors to enhance productivity and selectivity of chlorosilanes, particularly trichlorosilane, by adjusting fill level, particle size distribution, and reaction parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If low temperature conversion process is used to produce chlorosilanes, then energy consumption is reduced, but productivity and selectivity are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing dimensionless indices (K1 for reactor design, K2 for contact mass constitution, K3 for reaction conditions) that systematically optimize operating parameters. This allows the process to achieve high productivity and selectivity at lower temperatures by precisely controlling the interplay between reactor geometry, particle size distribution, and reaction conditions, thereby resolving the contradiction between energy consumption and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If complex reaction parameter management is implemented, then process control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through dimensionless indices that integrate multiple process parameters into unified control variables. The indices K1, K2, and K3 provide a feedback mechanism that simplifies complex parameter management by consolidating reactor design, contact mass constitution, and reaction conditions into manageable metrics, thereby improving process control without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms complex reaction parameter management into a simplified framework using dimensionless indices. By changing the parameter representation from multiple individual variables to three integrated indices (K1, K2, K3), the system achieves improved process control while reducing the apparent complexity of device management and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If real-time monitoring is implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement and detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidmeasurement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback through dimensionless indices that enable real-time monitoring of chlorosilane production processes. The indices K1, K2, and K3 consolidate multiple measurement parameters into unified metrics that are easier to detect and measure, thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing measurement and detection difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high economic efficiency and optimized production by operating within specific ranges of K1, K2, and K3, allowing for real-time monitoring and control, thereby reducing production costs and improving chlorosilane selectivity and productivity.

Implementation Method 1

This comprises fluidizing the silicon particles in a fluidized bed using a gas flow, wherein said fluidized bed is heated to high temperatures via a heating apparatus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

Addition of a silicon-containing reaction gas such as TCS causes a pyrolysis reaction to take place at the hot particle surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

This comprises fluidizing the silicon particles in a fluidized bed using a gas flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidisation: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 4

reaction of a hydrogen- and silicon tetrachloride-containing reaction gas with a particulate contact mass containing silicon and a catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 5

The hydrochlorination (HC) according to reaction (1) makes it possible to produce chlorosilanes from metallurgical silicon (Simg) by addition of hydrogen chloride (HCl) in a fluidized bed reactor, wherein the reaction proceeds exothermically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic Reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS12129177B2Process for preparing chlorosilanes
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 WACKER CHEMIE AG
  • US12129177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a process for producing chlorosilanes in a fluidized bed reactor by reaction of a hydrogen and silicon tetrachloride-containing reaction gas with a particulate contact mass containing silicon and a catalyst. The chlorosilanes have the general formula HnSiCl4-n and/or HmCl6-mSi2. The reactor design is described by an index K1, the constitution of the contact mass is described by an index K2 and the reaction conditions are described by an index K3.