Complex Hidden Markov Model for Startup Success Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Early-stage investors lack a detailed, quantified basis for evaluating investment opportunities in startups, relying on instinct, financial terms, or following others, which hinders effective prediction of a company's success.

Innovation Solution

A system using a Complex Hidden Markov Model (CHMM) to infer a company's current active state and predict its future stages by analyzing diverse, often inconsistent data sources, including self-reported and implicitly-generated data, to generate a success score with confidence intervals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If investors use gut-driven, term-driven, or lemming-like approaches, then decision-making is simple and quick, but prediction accuracy of company success is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a Complex Hidden Markov Model as an intermediary computational system that processes multiple data sources (explicit company data, implicit behavioral data, sequential events) to generate success probability predictions. This intermediary model bridges the gap between simple investment decisions and accurate success prediction by automating the analysis of complex patterns in company development sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms qualitative investment judgments into quantitative predictions by changing the parameters from subjective investor perceptions to objective probabilistic outputs. The CHMM converts sequential company events and data points into numerical success probabilities and confidence intervals, enabling precise measurement of prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If investors rely on instinct or following others, then evaluation process is fast and easy, but the basis for decision-making lacks quantification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantified basis for decision-makingVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by pre-processing and storing company data, events, and patterns in structured formats before investment evaluation is needed. The CHMM model is pre-trained on historical company sequences, so when an investment decision is required, the system can quickly query pre-computed success probabilities without performing full analysis from scratch, reducing evaluation time while maintaining quantified insights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a computational copy of the company's development trajectory by modeling its sequential events and state transitions. This digital replica allows investors to analyze company progression patterns without directly observing or interviewing the company, preserving information while reducing time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If a detailed quantified evaluation system is implemented, then prediction accuracy improves, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuccess prediction precisionVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the company evaluation process into distinct components: data collection from multiple sources, event sequencing, state transition modeling, and probability calculation. The CHMM divides company development into discrete states and transitions, allowing complex evaluation to be broken into manageable segments that can be processed independently and combined for final predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The CHMM framework serves multiple functions simultaneously: it tracks company progression through development stages, identifies current active states, predicts future outcomes, and generates confidence intervals. This universal model handles diverse data types (explicit data, implicit data, events) and produces comprehensive evaluation results, reducing the need for multiple separate analytical tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10929815B2Adaptive and reusable processing of retroactive sequences for automated predictions
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 SQUIRRO AG
  • US10929815B2 patent drawing
  • US10929815B2 patent drawing
  • US10929815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for predicting the outcome of a business entity are presented. In embodiments, a system may receive explicit data reporting or indicating activities of a business entity, and other data from which information regarding the activities or level of operations of the entity may be inferred. Using one or more data processors, the system may generate inferred data regarding the business entity from a selected portion of the other data, and use at least some of the explicit data and the inferred data to determine which one of a series of defined sequential active states of development the entity currently is in. The system may further, using the result of the determination as the current state of the business, predict a final stage of the business entity, and a probability of evolving to that final stage from the current state. Other embodiments may be disclosed or claimed.