Automatic Choke Back Pressure Control for Drilling Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional drilling methods face challenges in maintaining optimal back pressure within narrow wellbore stability windows due to variations in drilling fluid characteristics, such as density and temperature, which can lead to fluid intrusion or formation breakdown.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an automatic choke system that adjusts back pressure based on real-time pressure signals, using a control system to correlate pump speed and choke set points to maintain a near-constant bottom hole pressure, thereby controlling the annular pressure profile and preventing wellbore instability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual control of back pressure control device is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to delayed response to fluid condition changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to fluid condition changesVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a feedback mechanism where pressure sensors continuously monitor bottom hole pressure and annular pressure, and this information is fed back to the control system which automatically adjusts the choke opening to maintain pressure within the stability window, eliminating the need for manual intervention and enabling rapid response to fluid condition changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated choke control system performs self-adjustment based on real-time pressure measurements, where the control algorithm automatically calculates the required choke opening and actuates the choke without human intervention, allowing the system to service itself in maintaining wellbore stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If back pressure is increased to prevent formation flow, then reliability improves, but the risk of formation fracturing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewellbore stabilityVSAvoidformation fracturing risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts back pressure in real-time based on actual bottom hole pressure measurements and predicted pressure changes from fluid property variations, rather than using fixed high back pressure, allowing the wellbore pressure to be maintained within the stability window without exceeding fracture gradient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors and adjusts pressure parameters (bottom hole pressure, annular pressure) in response to changes in fluid density, temperature, and flow rate, modifying these parameters dynamically to maintain wellbore stability while avoiding formation fracturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If drilling fluid density is increased to control back pressure, then reliability improves, but the risk of drill string sticking and equipment damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control effectivenessVSAvoiddrill string sticking and equipment damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical approach of increasing mud weight with a controlled back pressure mechanism using a choke and automated pressure control system, which applies pressure control through flow restriction rather than through fluid weight, thereby avoiding the harmful effects of excessive hydrostatic pressure on the drill string and formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If conventional manual adjustment methods are used, then device complexity is lower, but measurement precision and control accuracy decrease due to delayed response to fluid variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control accuracyVSAvoidautomated control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses continuous feedback from pressure sensors monitoring bottom hole pressure and annular pressure to the control system, which automatically adjusts the choke opening in real-time to maintain pressure within the stability window, achieving high measurement precision and control accuracy through automated feedback control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs preliminary calculations to predict the required choke opening adjustment based on measured pressure deviations and fluid property changes, enabling proactive pressure control before significant deviations occur, thereby improving control accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise control of back pressure, maintaining the well within a stable pressure window, reducing the risk of fluid loss or blowout and enabling continuous drilling operations by automatically adjusting to changes in fluid conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a back pressure control device is mounted in the return flow line for the drilling fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBack pressure control: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

sufficient additional back pressure must be imposed on the drilling fluid such that the formation fluid is contained

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow restriction: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 3

When the mud pumps are off, a column of mud exerts hydrostatic pressure on the formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 4

When the mud pumps are on, the circulating fluid exerts a frictional pressure on the formation in addition to the hydrostatic pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrictional pressure: Friction

Implementation Method 5

The sensors include a bottom hole pressure sensor and an annular pressure sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure detection: Pressure-sensitive Paint

Data Source

PatentUS9932787B2Systems and methods for managed pressured drilling
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US9932787B2 patent drawing
  • US9932787B2 patent drawing
  • US9932787B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Stable back pressure control devices are used to control fluid pressure in a wellbore to provide constant downhole pressure. Back pressure may be estimated from a correlation between the speed of a mud pump and the pressure exerted from the pump. Drilling plans disclosed herein provide for the continued operation of one or more back pressure control devices for providing constant bottomhole pressure when casing connections are being made.