Choke Seat and Stroke Layout for Large Debris in Small Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional choke systems are inefficient, often built larger than necessary, leading to increased manufacturing and operating costs, as they fail to effectively accommodate larger debris while maintaining acceptable fluid dynamics.

Innovation Solution

The choke system is designed with reduced dimensions for the intake and increased dimensions for the seat and stroke length, allowing larger debris to pass through while using smaller conduits and maintaining fluid dynamics, by optimizing critical dimensions such as the minimum distance between the gate and input channel exit, and the seat channel diameter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional choke systems are built larger to accommodate larger debris, then debris passage capability is improved, but manufacturing costs and operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris passage capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the dimensions of different parts of the choke system. Specifically, the seat and stroke length are made larger to accommodate debris passage, while the intake dimensions are reduced to minimize cost. This selective sizing allows the system to pass large debris through the optimized seat area without requiring the entire system to be oversized, thereby resolving the contradiction between debris passage capability and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional choke systems are built larger to accommodate larger debris, then debris passage capability is improved, but operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris passage capabilityVSAvoidoperating cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by optimizing only the critical dimensions (seat and stroke length) that directly impact debris passage, rather than scaling up the entire system. This localized optimization reduces the overall size of the system, which in turn reduces operating costs associated with larger equipment while maintaining the capability to pass large debris through the specifically designed seat area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If intake dimensions are reduced to lower costs, then manufacturing cost decreases, but debris passage capability worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddebris passage capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the debris passage functionality in the seat and stroke length dimensions, while using smaller intake dimensions. This creates a specialized flow path through the seat that accommodates large debris without requiring the entire system, including the intake, to be oversized. The result is cost-effective manufacturing with maintained debris passage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If seat and stroke length are increased to pass larger debris, then debris passage capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris passage capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by making targeted increases only to the seat and stroke length dimensions that are critical for debris passage, rather than increasing all system dimensions. This localized approach improves debris passage capability while minimizing the overall complexity increase, as only specific components are modified rather than the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables the passage of larger debris without requiring larger lines, reducing costs and maintaining acceptable fluid dynamics, achieving economic advantages and improved operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the lower border of the gate being configured to engage the seat when the gate is fully closed to block fluid flow through the seat channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical blocking:

Implementation Method 2

the choke system is to convey fluid through the body channel and the seat channel when the gate is open and fluid is pressurized in the input channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-driven flow: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11885198B2Choke system with capacity for passage of large debris
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 SRI ENERGY INC
  • US11885198B2 patent drawing
  • US11885198B2 patent drawing
  • US11885198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include a choke system that passes enlarged debris despite having a relatively small diameter for an input port of the choke system. Embodiments also include systems to prevent dislodging of a choke seat when backpressure is supplied to the choke system. Embodiments also include sealing systems to prevent fluid leaks around the choke seat of the choke system.