Harvester Chopper Counter-Knife Control for Power and Chop Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chopper arrangements in agricultural harvesters consume significant power, leading to high fuel consumption and limit harvester capacity, and suffer from counter knife wear, affecting chopping quality.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that adjusts the insertion amount and angle of counter knives relative to rotating knife rows based on sensor data, optimizing chop intensity and power consumption using independent actuators for translational and rotational movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the counter knives are inserted further into the housing to increase overlap with rotating knives, then chopping intensity increases, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechopping intensityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The counter knife bank is made dynamically adjustable through independent actuators that control both the amount of insertion (translational movement) and angle of insertion (rotational movement). This dynamic configuration allows the system to optimize chopping intensity while minimizing power consumption by adjusting the degree and angle of knife engagement based on operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters of the counter knife arrangement by independently adjusting the insertion amount (position parameter) and insertion angle (orientation parameter). These parameter changes enable fine-tuning of the chopping action to achieve optimal performance with reduced power consumption compared to fixed full-insertion configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If the counter knives are retracted away from rotating knives to decrease overlap, then power consumption decreases, but chopping quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidchopping quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic adjustment capability allows the counter knife bank to be positioned at optimal insertion amounts and angles for different chopping requirements. This ensures high chopping quality is maintained only when necessary, while allowing power-efficient configurations when full chopping intensity is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By independently varying the insertion amount and angle parameters, the system can maintain optimal chopping quality (when parameters are set for maximum engagement) while consuming less power (when parameters are adjusted for reduced engagement), resolving the trade-off between quality and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single actuator controls counter knife position, then device complexity is reduced, but ability to independently optimize chopping intensity and power consumption is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator system complexityVSAvoidcontrol flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent actuators: one actuator controls the translational movement (insertion amount) of the counter knife bank, while another actuator controls the rotational movement (insertion angle). This segmentation allows independent optimization of chopping intensity and power consumption without increasing overall system complexity, as each actuator handles a specific degree of freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a second degree of freedom (rotational dimension) to the counter knife adjustment mechanism. While this increases adaptability by allowing independent control of insertion amount and angle, the complexity is managed by using separate simple actuators for each dimensional adjustment rather than a complex single actuator system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12527254B2Control of a chopper arrangement for an agricultural harvester
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC
  • US12527254B2 patent drawing
  • US12527254B2 patent drawing
  • US12527254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for controlling a chopper arrangement of an agricultural harvester. The controller receives sensor data indicative of an intensity of chopping performed on crop material by the chopper arrangement, and sensor data indicative of a power consumption of the chopper arrangement. The controller has a processor to determine an actuator setting for a chopper arrangement actuator of the agricultural harvester in dependence on the received sensor data indicative of the intensity of chopping and the received sensor data indicative of the power consumption. The controller sends an actuator control signal to the chopper arrangement actuator to control the chopper arrangement actuator to operate in accordance with the associated determined actuator setting. The determined actuator setting includes an amount of insertion, and an angle of insertion, of at least one bank of counter knives of the chopper arrangement relative to rotatable knife rows of the chopper arrangement.