Combined Heat and Power System Control via Decision Model Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for controlling combined heat and power systems fail to ensure secure and efficient supply of both power and heat, often leading to insufficient or excessive heat supply and security risks.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that establish a decision model to minimize total costs of generators and heating exchange stations, determining operation states to control the system, incorporating objective functions and constraints for electric and heating power output, and integrating start-stop control decisions to balance power and heat systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional control methods are used for combined heat and power systems, then the system operation is simple, but the security of supplying power and heat cannot be ensured and heat supply may be insufficient or excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of supplying power and heatVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the control problem into an optimization problem by changing the parameters being controlled (power output, heat output, generator states) and using mathematical modeling to find optimal parameter combinations that satisfy multiple constraints simultaneously, thereby ensuring security of supply while maintaining manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calculations and optimizations in advance to determine optimal operation states for generators and heating exchange stations. By pre-calculating the decision model and optimal operation states before actual operation, the system can quickly implement reliable control without complex real-time adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If conventional control methods are used, then the control process is simple, but wind power consumption is not improved and energy efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewind power consumptionVSAvoiddecision model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms by using the decision model to continuously evaluate system performance and adjust operation states. The optimization model considers actual wind power availability and system demands, providing feedback-driven control that maximizes wind power consumption while managing the complexity through structured mathematical frameworks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The decision model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it optimizes power generation, heat supply, wind power consumption, and cost minimization. By creating a universal optimization framework that handles multiple objectives together, the patent improves wind power consumption and energy efficiency without requiring separate complex control systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If optimal operation states are determined through decision modeling, then total cost is minimized and energy efficiency is improved, but the calculation and control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex real-time mechanical control adjustments with mathematical optimization calculations. By substituting physical trial-and-error control methods with computational decision modeling, the system achieves improved energy efficiency while managing calculation complexity through structured mathematical approaches rather than brute-force methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11411406B2Method, apparatus, and storage medium for controlling combined heat and power system
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 STATE GRID JILIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY LIMITED
  • US11411406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method, an apparatus and a storage medium for controlling a combined heat and power system, belonging to the field of power system technologies. The method discloses: establishing a decision model, the decision model including an objective function aiming to minimize a total cost of the first generators and the second generators, and constraints with respect to the first generators, the second generators and the heating exchange stations; solving the decision model to acquire operation states of the first generators, operation states of the second generators, and operations states of the heating exchange stations; and controlling the combined heat and power system, based on the operation states of the first generators, the operation states of the second generators, and the operations states of the heating exchange stations.