Chroma Dropout Detection Using Co-occurrence Matrices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting chroma dropout errors in digital video are either manual and unreliable or computation-intensive, making them impractical for ensuring the quality of delivered content.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that automates the detection of chroma dropout errors by grouping pixels into pairs, calculating co-occurrence matrices, and analyzing chroma and luma values to identify errors through a series of predetermined thresholds and motion compensation techniques, allowing for quick, accurate, and efficient error identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual checking of video data is used for quality verification, then reliability of error detection is improved, but productivity and ease of operation deteriorate due to impracticality and unreliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality verification reliabilityVSAvoiderror detection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-verification of video quality by automatically detecting chroma dropout errors without requiring manual intervention. The error detection system processes video data autonomously, generating reports that indicate the presence or absence of chroma dropout errors, thereby achieving both reliability and productivity improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical checking with an automated computational system. The error detection mechanism uses algorithms to automatically analyze chroma components, compare them against threshold values, and identify dropout errors, substituting human operators with an automated digital system that maintains reliability while significantly improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated error detection systems are implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and computation intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The error detection system is segmented into distinct functional modules: chroma component extraction, threshold comparison, error identification, and report generation. Each module performs a specific function independently, making the overall complex task manageable and the system architecture modular. This segmentation reduces the perceived complexity by breaking down the automated detection process into discrete, understandable steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses configurable threshold parameters to simplify the detection logic. By establishing predetermined threshold values for chroma component comparisons, the system transforms complex visual quality assessment into straightforward parameter comparisons. This parameter-based approach reduces computational complexity while maintaining automated detection capability, as the system only needs to compare values against stored thresholds rather than performing complex analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive quality verification is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo quality measurement accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical chroma components (Cb and Cr) from the video data for analysis, rather than processing the entire video stream in detail. By focusing extraction on specific color information that is most susceptible to dropout errors, the system achieves precise quality verification for the most important aspects while significantly reducing the time and computational resources required compared to comprehensive analysis of all video parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The error detection system performs partial verification by checking only specific conditions (chroma component thresholds) rather than conducting exhaustive analysis of all video properties. This partial action approach is sufficient to detect chroma dropout errors while avoiding the time-consuming complete verification process, achieving an optimal balance between measurement precision and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8804046B1Methods and systems for detection of chroma dropouts in video
Publication Date: 2014.08.12 INTERRA SYSTEMS INC
  • US8804046B1 patent drawing
  • US8804046B1 patent drawing
  • US8804046B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for detecting chroma dropout errors in one or more fields associated with various video frames are provided. Pixels associated with a current field are divided into a set of pixel pairs. Co-occurrences matrices are calculated for previous and subsequent fields. A first pixel pair associated with the current field is selected. First and second set of entries are selected from the co-occurrence matrices corresponding to the previous and subsequent fields. The first pixel pair is searched in the first and second set of entries. An absence of the first pixel pair in the first and second set of entries satisfies a first criterion of chroma dropout error. Other criteria in addition to the first criterion are evaluated to label the first pixel pair as erroneous.