Chromatograph Calibration for Reliable Peak Detection Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chromatographs face variability in detection accuracy over time, leading to potential missed detections of substances at or above reference concentrations due to changes in the instrument's state and inappropriate peak identification processes.

Innovation Solution

An analysis method involving the use of a reference sample to calibrate the chromatograph, obtaining reference detection values, calculating judgment reference values, and analyzing measurement samples based on these values to determine the presence of detection subject components within specific peak detection time zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional chromatographic analysis is used without reference sample calibration, then the analysis process is simple and quick, but detection accuracy deteriorates over time due to instrument state changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing reference sample analysis before actual measurement to establish a judgment reference value. This preliminary calibration step accounts for the current instrument state, enabling accurate detection throughout the measurement period without requiring continuous complex adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a reference sample as an intermediary standard between the instrument and the actual measurement. This reference sample serves as a mediator to translate instrument responses into accurate concentration judgments, compensating for instrument drift without requiring direct complex calibration of each measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If reference sample calibration is performed, then detection accuracy is improved and instrument variability is corrected, but the analysis time and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reference sample analysis is performed as a preliminary step before batch measurements. This one-time calibration establishes the judgment reference value that can be used for multiple subsequent measurements, improving reliability without proportionally increasing total analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter basis for detection from absolute instrument response to a relative judgment reference value derived from reference sample analysis. This parameter transformation enables more reliable detection by accounting for instrument variability while maintaining efficient measurement throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional peak identification methods are used, then the analysis process is straightforward, but detection accuracy deteriorates when peaks are misidentified or waveform cutting is inappropriate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak identification accuracyVSAvoididentification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the reference sample analysis results to establish a judgment reference value that guides peak identification. The detection value from the measurement sample is compared against this reference-based criterion, providing feedback that confirms or refutes the presence of the detection subject component, thereby improving identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual or simple automated peak identification with a judgment-based system that uses reference sample calibration data. This substitution transforms peak identification from a purely waveform-based mechanical process to a reference-comparison system, improving accuracy while maintaining process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11830714B2Analysis method and non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 SHIMADZU CORP
  • US11830714B2 patent drawing
  • US11830714B2 patent drawing
  • US11830714B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An analysis method includes analyzing a reference sample that contains a predetermined amount of a predetermined component by an analysis device using a chromatograph and obtaining a reference detection value which is a detection value of the predetermined amount of the predetermined component detected by the analysis device, calculating a judgment reference value which is a criterion for judging whether a concentration of a detection subject component in a measurement subject sample is equal to or larger than a reference concentration or equal to or smaller than the reference concentration based on the reference detection value, and analyzing the measurement subject sample by the analysis device and judging that the detection subject component has been detected in a case where a detection value exceeding the judgment reference value is detected in a peak detection time zone corresponding to the detection subject component.