Chromatography System Adaptive Column Efficiency Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In liquid chromatography systems, achieving consistent and repeatable results is challenging due to variations in column packing properties and resin capacities over time, especially in continuous chromatography processes where identical columns are crucial for optimal performance and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A liquid chromatography system with a controller that adapts process parameters based on specific column data, ensuring each column operates within optimal conditions to maintain performance and produce consistent results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If columns are packed with chromatography medium to achieve high binding capacity, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to complex packing procedures and variability in packing properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding capacityVSAvoidcolumn packing consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures actual column properties (packing height, pressure differential, flow rate) and uses this feedback to adjust process parameters. Column efficiency is tested and data is stored, then used to adapt subsequent processing conditions, creating a closed-loop system that compensates for packing variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters (flow rate, processing conditions) based on measured column properties. Each column receives customized process parameters adapted to its specific packing characteristics, transforming a manufacturing precision problem into a controllable operational parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of stationary object

If columns are replaced or changed in a validated process, then maintenance and resin lifetime management are improved, but reliability deteriorates due to difficulty in achieving identical column properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresin lifetimeVSAvoidprocess consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

When columns are replaced or resin lifetime is approached, the system adjusts process parameters based on the new column's measured properties. This ensures that even though the physical column changes, the process output remains consistent by adapting operational conditions to each column's characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors column performance and efficiency, storing data that informs both maintenance decisions and process parameter adjustments. This feedback loop ensures reliability is maintained through proactive adaptation rather than passive replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If process parameters are standardized for validated processes, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates when column properties or feed composition vary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess validationVSAvoidcolumn property tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static standardized parameters to dynamic adaptive parameters. Process conditions are automatically adjusted based on real-time or pre-measured column properties and feed composition, maintaining ease of operation through automation while gaining adaptability to variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies process parameters based on actual column efficiency measurements and feed characteristics. This allows the process to adapt to different columns and feed compositions while maintaining standardized operational procedures through automated parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If column packing is optimized for high capacity, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to the complex nature of achieving repeatable packing results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechromatography capacityVSAvoidpacking procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical packing optimization with automated measurement and computational adaptation. Instead of relying on precise mechanical packing procedures, the system uses electronic sensing, data storage, and automated parameter adjustment to achieve consistent results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from column efficiency testing to compensate for packing variations. This transforms a complex mechanical problem into a manageable information processing task, where measurements guide parameter adjustments rather than requiring perfect initial packing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12188911B2Chromatography system
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 CYTIVA SWEDEN AB
  • US12188911B2 patent drawing
  • US12188911B2 patent drawing
  • US12188911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chromatography system arranged to perform automated chromatography column efficiency testing for a specific column to determine efficiency parameters and to further provide guidance to the user. The system has a controller arranged to automatically access data to enable the calculation of a column compression plate height, said data being derived from at least stored parameters of the specific column and the resin to be used in the column, to calculate the efficiency of the column.