Automated Chromatography Column Packing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chromatography column packing is inefficient and variable, leading to low repeatability and high operator error, with manual packing methods resulting in less than 50% of columns meeting specifications, causing inefficiency and media loss.

Innovation Solution

An automated system using an actuator to adjust the bed support within the column, combined with pressure and position sensors, and a controller to manage the packing process based on media type, allowing for constant velocity or pressure packing algorithms to ensure uniform media compaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual packing methods are used, then operator flexibility is maintained, but packing time is excessive and repeatability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverepeatabilityVSAvoidpacking time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical packing operations with an automated computer-controlled system that uses sensors to detect media position and actuators to adjust the adjuster assembly, eliminating operator variability and significantly improving repeatability while reducing packing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor the position of the media bed and provide feedback to the controller, enabling real-time adjustments to achieve uniform packing density and maintain consistent results across multiple packing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If manual packing is performed, then setup flexibility is preserved, but operator error increases and yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidoperator error
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs self-monitoring and self-adjustment during the packing process, with sensors detecting media characteristics and the controller automatically modifying packing parameters to optimize yield and eliminate operator-induced errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

By replacing manual operations with automated actuators and computer control, the system eliminates operator error entirely while maintaining or improving ease of manufacture through consistent, repeatable packing processes that maximize column yield

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If automated packing is implemented, then repeatability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverepeatabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated packing system integrates multiple functions into a single platform, including media detection, adjuster positioning, compression control, and process monitoring, which manages device complexity through functional integration while maintaining high repeatability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between sensors and actuators, coordinating their interactions to achieve uniform packing. This centralized control manages the complexity of multiple components by providing a single point of coordination that ensures repeatable results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7435350B2Intelligent system and method for automated packing of chromatography columns
Publication Date: 2008.10.14 EMD MILLIPORE CORP
  • US7435350B2 patent drawing
  • US7435350B2 patent drawing
  • US7435350B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides an automated system and method for packing chromatography columns. In one embodiment, the system first determines the type of media that is present in the column, and uses this information to generate an automated procedure to pack the specific media type. In a second embodiment, the media type is made known to the system, such as via input from the operator. The system then uses this information, in the same manner as in the first embodiment, to generate an automated procedure to pack the specific media type. Finally, in a third embodiment, parameters such as column height and rate of compression are made known to the system, such as via input from the operator. The system then packs the column in accordance with these supplied parameters.