Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Data Alignment via Feature Grouping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for aligning chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets are computationally expensive and prone to systematic errors due to shifts in retention times caused by instrument drift and column chemistry changes, making reliable time-scale adjustment challenging, especially in metabolomics studies.

Innovation Solution

The method involves identifying feature groups in data sets by evaluating intensity patterns, matching these groups across datasets, and determining a corrected time scale based on time differences between matching groups, which reduces false positives and improves computational efficiency by focusing on group alignments rather than individual peak matching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual peak matching methods are used for time alignment, then alignment detail is improved, but computational cost and susceptibility to systematic errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual peaks into feature groups based on their retention time and mass-to-charge ratio proximity. By merging related peaks that belong to the same chemical feature, the method reduces the total number of matching operations required while maintaining alignment precision, thus resolving the contradiction between detailed alignment and computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If individual peak matching methods are used for time alignment, then alignment detail is improved, but reliability decreases due to systematic errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidalignment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By grouping multiple peaks that represent the same chemical feature across different spectra, the method creates more robust reference points for alignment. This merging approach reduces the impact of systematic errors and false matches that plague individual peak matching, thereby improving reliability while maintaining the precision needed for accurate time alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feature groups as representative copies of chemical features that appear across multiple spectra. Instead of matching individual peaks that may be affected by noise or systematic drift, the method creates standardized feature group representations that can be reliably matched across datasets, improving alignment reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Quantity of substance

If comprehensive peak matching is performed across all data sets, then alignment coverage is improved, but computational expense increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of matched featuresVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive set of all peaks into smaller feature groups based on their chemical identity and retention time characteristics. This segmentation allows the matching algorithm to work with fewer, more meaningful units rather than every individual peak, significantly reducing computational expense while maintaining coverage of all relevant chemical features across the datasets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11573213B2Method for time-alignment of chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 THERMO FISHER SCI BREMEN
  • US11573213B2 patent drawing
  • US11573213B2 patent drawing
  • US11573213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for adjusting the time scale of chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets, wherein a time scale of a first data set is used as a reference time scale and wherein a time scale of at least one second data set is adapted to the reference time scale. The steps of the method include identifying feature groups in the first data set by evaluating intensities of consecutive points of the first data set; identifying feature groups in the second data set by evaluating intensities of consecutive points of the second data set; matching feature groups of the first data set to feature groups of the second data set, and determining a corrected time scale for the second data set based on time differences between feature groups in the first data set and matching feature groups in the second data set.