Liquid Chromatography Valve Control for Common-Pressure Gradient Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) systems face challenges in providing continuous or gradient flow of mobile phases from two pumps with differing compressibilities, requiring additional fluids to account for pressure equalization, which complicates the delivery of mobile phases at a common pressure.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising two pumps, pressure sensors, and a controller that regulates the flow through a valve with specific stator and rotor configurations to ensure communication and pressure matching between the pumps, allowing for continuous or gradient flow of mobile phases at a common pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If two pumps with differing compressibilities are used to provide mobile phases, then the system can achieve gradient flow capability, but pressure equalization becomes difficult requiring additional fluids

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradient flow capabilityVSAvoidpressure equalization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Pressure sensors are installed on each pump to monitor pressure levels, and a controller receives these signals to regulate pump operation. This feedback mechanism enables automatic pressure equalization between pumps with different compressibilities, eliminating the need for additional compensating fluids while maintaining gradient flow capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters (pressure, flow rate) of each pump based on real-time conditions. By changing these parameters through controller regulation, the system achieves pressure equalization between pumps with different compressibilities, resolving the contradiction between gradient flow capability and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If mobile phases are provided at different pressures from two pumps, then each pump can operate independently, but effective flow through the valve is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent pump operationVSAvoidflow effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system equalizes pressure (creates equipotential conditions) between the two pumps before they discharge through the valve. By ensuring both pumps operate at the same pressure level through sensor feedback and controller regulation, the system maintains independent pump operation while ensuring effective and reliable flow through the valve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Adaptability or versatility

If a valve with multiple positions is used to facilitate flow from two pumps, then flow flexibility is improved, but the complexity of pressure matching increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow flexibilityVSAvoidpressure matching complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Pressure sensors on each pump provide real-time pressure data to the controller, which regulates pump operation to maintain pressure equality. This feedback control simplifies the pressure matching requirement for the multi-position valve, allowing the valve to achieve flow flexibility without increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3759382B1System and valve for liquid chromatography
Publication Date: 2024.05.15 VALCO INSTRUMENT COMPANY INC
  • EP3759382B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3759382B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3759382B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Systems for use with liquid chromatography for provision of continuous flow or gradient flow in connection with two pumps providing mobile phase to a valve.