Chronic Care Treatment Control with Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current glucose control methods for diabetic patients are hindered by high variability in blood glucose levels due to inaccurate estimation of treatment parameters, such as food intake and physical activity, leading to repetitive errors and complex counteractive actions, with existing solutions failing to provide a systematic basis for accurate estimation and correction.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that record and track arbitrary factor types, analyze response errors, and isolate errors in factor correlations to refine estimation and improve treatment outcomes through a continuous feedback system, enabling patients to form a consistent basis for managing blood glucose levels effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If patients manually estimate treatment parameters (food intake, physical activity), then they can manage their diabetes with available tools, but estimation accuracy deteriorates leading to high blood glucose variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient management capabilityVSAvoidestimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors actual blood glucose levels and compares them with predicted levels based on estimated treatment parameters. This feedback loop identifies estimation errors and adjusts future predictions, progressively improving accuracy while maintaining ease of use for patients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs complex calculations and error analysis without requiring patient intervention. It self-corrects estimation errors by analyzing the relationship between treatment parameters and actual glucose responses, providing improved accuracy while keeping the patient interface simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If patients make repetitive estimates about treatment parameters, then they can control blood glucose levels, but error accumulation increases leading to poor control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblood glucose control frequencyVSAvoidcontrol consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes the relationship between repeated treatment parameter inputs and actual blood glucose responses to identify systematic errors. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from repetitive patterns and improve the reliability of glucose control predictions over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts prediction parameters based on observed patterns in patient data. By changing the internal models based on actual responses to repetitive treatments, the system maintains high productivity while improving reliability through adaptive parameter refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If complex mathematical models are used to predict metabolic response, then prediction accuracy improves, but system complexity increases making communication difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetabolic response prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex mathematical model is segmented into multiple simpler sub-models, each handling a specific aspect of metabolic response (e.g., food intake, exercise, medication). This segmentation maintains prediction accuracy while reducing overall system complexity and improving communicateability with patients and providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between complex mathematical models and user interface. This intermediary translates complex model outputs into simple, actionable insights for patients and providers, maintaining high prediction accuracy while hiding the underlying complexity from end users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If standardized databases of food and activities are used, then estimation basis is provided, but accuracy deteriorates for arbitrary or custom factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimation basis availabilityVSAvoidcustom factor estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines standardized databases with flexible, adaptive modeling capabilities. It can handle both standardized factors (using database values) and arbitrary/custom factors (using learned patterns from patient data), providing a universal solution that maintains ease of use while improving accuracy for diverse scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static standardized databases to dynamic, adaptive models that learn from patient-specific responses. This allows the system to maintain the simplicity of standardized approaches for common factors while dynamically adapting to handle arbitrary and custom factors with high accuracy based on individual patient patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8185412B1Method and apparatus for chronic care treatment control with custom named-type factors and user estimation error correction
Publication Date: 2012.05.22 HARPALE MAHESH
  • US8185412B1 patent drawing
  • US8185412B1 patent drawing
  • US8185412B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus to record and track patient's estimation of arbitrary factor types, to analyze response errors utilizing discrete measurements, to isolate errors in various factor types and their response correlations, to enable patient in refining factor mix to reduce estimated outcome variations, and to improve patient estimation with corrections using a continuous feedback system. The input factors for the treatment in case of a Diabetic patient may be food intake, medication, activity, stress level etc, while the treatment outcome or response may be blood glucose level that the patient needs to keep within specific limits. Present invention enables a chronic care patient, such as a Diabetic patient, to make better and informed decisions about their treatment, reduce input factor estimation errors, reduce outcome parameter variations, and improve the patient well being by better treatment control.