Chronic Network Incident Detection from Repeated Reset History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication network systems fail to detect and address chronic incidents effectively, leading to repetitive failures, outages, and degraded services due to repeated temporary corrective actions that do not resolve the root cause of the incidents.

Innovation Solution

Implement a method and system that monitors alarms, generates incident reports, and tags chronic incidents based on a history of similar repetitive resolutions, prioritizing them for targeted root cause investigation and automated resolution plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If temporary corrective actions (reset actions) are repeatedly applied to resolve incidents, then incident resolution speed is improved, but the root cause remains unresolved leading to chronic incidents and network degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident resolution speedVSAvoidnetwork service stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of incident patterns by monitoring and storing incident data before chronic degradation occurs. The chronic incident detection mechanism proactively identifies repetitive incident patterns and triggers root cause analysis before the network service is significantly degraded, preventing the cycle of temporary fixes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where incident resolution data is continuously monitored and fed back into the detection mechanism. When the same incident pattern recurs at a network element, the system learns from previous resolutions and automatically escalates to root cause analysis, preventing repeated temporary fixes and improving long-term reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual monitoring and analysis of incident patterns is performed, then chronic incidents can be detected, but system complexity and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechronic incident detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically monitoring its own incident data and detecting chronic patterns without requiring manual intervention. The chronic incident detection mechanism autonomously analyzes incident histories, identifies repetitive patterns, and triggers appropriate responses, reducing operational overhead while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary chronic incident detection mechanism that sits between the incident management system and network operations. This intermediary automatically processes incident data, identifies patterns, and provides structured information to operators, reducing the complexity of manual monitoring while improving detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated systems perform reset actions on network elements, then resolution efficiency is improved, but automated systems may not identify appropriate actions for complex chronic incidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident resolution efficiencyVSAvoidresolution action appropriateness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the resolution approach based on incident characteristics. For simple incidents, automated reset actions are performed immediately. For chronic incidents detected through pattern recognition, the system dynamically escalates to more complex resolution processes including root cause analysis and multiple action items, ensuring appropriate responses for each incident type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the incident resolution process into different levels: automated simple resolutions for routine incidents, and structured multi-step processes for chronic incidents. This segmentation allows automated systems to handle routine cases efficiently while directing complex cases to more sophisticated handling procedures, maintaining both efficiency and appropriateness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4611330A1Methods and systems for chronic incident mitigation and resolution
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • EP4611330A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4611330A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4611330A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method comprises generating an incident report based on an alarm, obtaining a history of prior incident reports associated with the network element, the history of prior incident reports including data associated with a plurality of prior incident reports that were created in response to a plurality of prior alarms triggered at the network element, and each of the prior incident reports comprising a resolution identifier identifying a resolution of a prior incident, determining that the incident is a chronic incident when the history of prior incident reports includes at least a threshold quantity of prior incident reports comprising the resolution identifier identifying that the prior incidents at the network element were resolved based on at least one of a self-clear action or a reset action, and adding a tag to the incident report indicating that the incident report describes the chronic incident.