CIJ Printer Optical Monitoring Stroke Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Continuous inkjet (CIJ) printers face challenges in quickly identifying and correcting misprints due to fluctuations in operating parameters, requiring complex commissioning procedures and not being true plug-and-play systems, especially in high-speed printing applications.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating CIJ printers with optical monitoring that involves generating a bitmap of the desired image, sequentially controlling charge and deflection electrodes to apply ink droplets, capturing the printed image, and automating the comparison of the desired and actual images stroke by stroke, allowing for immediate detection of errors and adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If camera monitoring is implemented to detect misprints, then printing quality control is improved, but the system complexity and commissioning time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting quality controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the bitmap into individual strokes and further divides each stroke into multiple partial strokes. This segmentation allows the monitoring system to verify printing quality stroke by stroke rather than requiring complete image capture and complex overall analysis, thereby improving reliability while reducing system complexity and commissioning requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining the expected positions of ink droplets in each stroke before actual printing occurs. The system compares actual droplet positions against these pre-established reference positions, enabling quality control without requiring complex real-time analysis or extensive commissioning procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If complete bitmap verification is performed, then printing accuracy is improved, but verification time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complete bitmap verification into smaller stroke-level verifications. By checking each stroke independently as it is printed rather than waiting for the complete image, the system maintains printing accuracy through continuous monitoring while significantly reducing verification time and enabling faster error detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by verifying only the current stroke being printed rather than requiring complete bitmap verification. This partial verification approach maintains sufficient printing accuracy for quality control while dramatically reducing the time required, allowing the system to operate in high-speed printing environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If traditional teach-in procedures are used, then optical monitoring accuracy is improved, but commissioning complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical monitoring accuracyVSAvoidcommissioning ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the teach-in process into stroke-level operations. Instead of requiring complex overall system calibration, the system performs simple teach-in procedures for individual strokes, recording expected droplet positions for each stroke separately. This segmentation maintains optical monitoring accuracy while dramatically simplifying commissioning procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-recording the expected positions of ink droplets for each stroke during a simple teach-in process. These pre-recorded reference positions enable accurate optical monitoring without requiring complex commissioning, as the system compares actual printing against these pre-established benchmarks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies pattern recognition, increases verification speed, and reduces hardware requirements, enabling quicker error detection and correction, thus improving the precision and sensitivity of the printing process while allowing for a more straightforward teach-in process.

Implementation Method 1

the droplets required for the actual printing process are produced from the ink jet according to the basic principle of Rayleigh's decay of laminar liquid jets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRayleigh instability: Plateau-Rayleigh Instability

Implementation Method 2

The droplet formation and in particular the droplet size is controlled by a modulation, which is, for example, impressed on the inkjet by piezo elements excited in a suitable manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

The droplets produced in this way are electrically charged in a suitable manner and guided by deflection electrodes to a desired trajectory

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS11858267B2Method for operating a CIJ printer with optical monitoring of printing quality, CIJ printer with optical monitoring of printing quality, and method for teaching-in a CIJ printer with optical monitoring of printing quality
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 PAUL LEIBINGER GMBH & CO KG NUMMERIER UND MARKIERUNGSSYSTEME
  • US11858267B2 patent drawing
  • US11858267B2 patent drawing
  • US11858267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a method for operating a CIJ printer with an optical monitoring means (80) having the steps of generating a bitmap (90,180) of the printed image to be printed, sequential controlling of charge electrodes (25) and/or deflection electrodes (30) of the CIJ printer, in order to generate dots or groups of dots of the bitmap (90,190) by applying ink droplets (12) to a substrate (100) to be printed and thus to sequentially apply a real printed image (195) to the substrate (100), capturing the real printed image (195) applied to the substrate (100) with the optical monitoring means (80), and automated comparing of the bitmap (90,190) of the desired printed image and of the real printed image (195) which has been applied to the substrate (100) and has been captured with the optical monitoring means (80), wherein the bitmap (90,190) of the desired printed image and the real image applied to the substrate (100) are automatically compared either on the basis of rows or columns of the bitmap (90,190) or on the basis of components of rows or columns of the bitmap (90,190), a CIJ printer for carrying out such a method and a method for teaching-in an optical monitoring means (80) of such a CIJ printer.