CIM/E Model Conformance Testing Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Common Information Model (CIM) standard conformance testing lacks automated methods for CIM/E models, leading to high human intervention, subjective detection results, and inefficiencies in quantifying tested function points.

Innovation Solution

A standard conformance testing system and method that automatically generates and checks CIM/E standard and defect models, performs import and export testing, and reduces manual intervention by using a human-computer interaction module, testing rule set, model generation, and model checking modules aligned with GB/T 30149 and DL/T 1380 standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual detection methods are used for CIM/E model standard conformance testing, then flexibility in handling complex testing scenarios is maintained, but human intervention increases and subjectivity affects detection results

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFlexibility in handling testing scenariosVSAvoidHuman intervention level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary translation layer that converts natural language standard descriptions into machine-executable detection rules. This intermediary component (the translation module) bridges the gap between human-readable standards and automated detection systems, enabling automation while preserving the flexibility of natural language standard interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical detection processes with an automated information processing system. The detection system uses computer-based modules to automatically translate standards, generate detection rules, execute tests, and analyze results, substituting human operators with automated computational processes that eliminate subjectivity while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable rule generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual detection methods are used for CIM/E model testing, then complex testing scenarios can be handled flexibly, but detection efficiency decreases and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAbility to handle complex testing scenariosVSAvoidDetection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-translating standard descriptions into structured detection rules before actual testing begins. The translation module converts natural language standards into machine-executable formats in advance, and the rule generation module prepares detection rules beforehand, enabling efficient automated execution without manual intervention during the actual testing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual detection mechanics with automated information processing. The system uses computer-based translation, rule generation, and detection execution modules that automatically process testing scenarios, eliminating the time-consuming manual operations while maintaining the ability to handle complex scenarios through programmable rule-based detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If natural language description of standards is used, then human understanding is facilitated, but quantification of tested function points becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHuman understanding of standardsVSAvoidQuantification of tested function points
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the natural language standard descriptions into distinct structural components (elements, attributes, relationships, constraints) that can be individually translated and quantified. The translation module divides standards into measurable functional points, enabling precise quantification while preserving the human-readable structure through hierarchical organization of detection rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the parameter representation from natural language descriptions to structured quantitative parameters. The translation module converts qualitative standard descriptions into quantitative detection parameters with defined measurement criteria, enabling precise measurement while maintaining the connection to original standard terminology through the structured rule representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automated detection is implemented for CIM/E models, then detection efficiency and productivity improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDetection efficiencyVSAvoidSystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the automated detection system into distinct functional modules: translation module, rule generation module, detection execution module, and result analysis module. This segmentation allows each module to perform a specific function independently, reducing overall system complexity while enabling automated detection through coordinated module operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal detection framework that can handle multiple CIM/E model testing scenarios through a single integrated system. The rule generation module generates detection rules for various testing scenarios, and the execution module adapts to different test cases, providing multi-functional capability that reduces the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11176028B2System, method and storage device for CIM/E model standard compliance test
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 CHINA ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO LTD
  • US11176028B2 patent drawing
  • US11176028B2 patent drawing
  • US11176028B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A standard conformance testing system and method for a CIM/E model of a power system and a storage medium include: converting the standards “Power Grid Common Model Description Specification (GB/T 30149)” and “Power Grid Operating Model Data Exchange Specification (DL/T 1380)” into practically operable testing rules, and performing automatic generation and verification of a CIM/E standard model and defect model. The testing system and method can improve the comprehensiveness and standardization of a CIM/E model standard compliance test, improving testing efficiency, promoting the level of standardization according to the CIM/E model in a power system software development process, and real time data exchange and interoperation between respective application systems, effectively supporting the safe and stable operation of a power grid.