Client Device Cipher Logging for Legal Decryption Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is currently no way for users to detect if encrypted data communicated over a network, captured for legal reasons, was encrypted using a cipher without forward secrecy, making it susceptible to legal decryption.

Innovation Solution

A client device determines if a connection with a server uses a cipher without forward secrecy, logs this information, and upon receiving a response code indicating a resource is unavailable for legal reasons, checks the log to identify previous connections using such ciphers, then alerts the user that the data from those connections may be subject to legal decryption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If encryption without forward secrecy is used to protect data communication, then data can be decrypted for legal reasons, but users have no way to detect such legal decryption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetectability of legal decryptionVSAvoiduser awareness of encryption vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by logging connection information and cipher types during initial connections. When a connection using non-forward-secret cipher is detected, the system stores this information in advance, enabling future detection and notification when legal decryption requests occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by notifying users when their previously encrypted data may have been subject to legal decryption. The notification mechanism provides feedback about the security status of past communications, allowing users to understand when their data was vulnerable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If all connection information is logged to enable detection, then user awareness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser awareness of encryption vulnerabilityVSAvoidlogging and checking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential information needed for detection - specifically whether a connection used a cipher without forward secrecy. By logging only this critical security attribute rather than all connection details, the system minimizes complexity while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified copy of connection information in the log, storing only the security-relevant characteristics (cipher type with/without forward secrecy) rather than complete connection data. This copying approach enables detection without requiring complex storage and processing of full connection records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9742813B2Detecting potential legal decryption of historical data
Publication Date: 2017.08.22 ADOBE INC
  • US9742813B2 patent drawing
  • US9742813B2 patent drawing
  • US9742813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods provide for detecting the potential legal decryption of transmitted data. When a device connects to a server over a network, such as the Internet, the device determines whether a cipher without forward secrecy is used. If so, information regarding the connection is stored in a log. When the device subsequently connects to the server and receives a response code indicating that a resource is not available for legal reasons, the device checks the log to determine if the device has previously communicated with the server using a cipher without forward secrecy. Based on the check, the previous connection with the server is identified from the log. A message is presented indicating that data from the previous connection could be subject to legal decryption.