Adaptive CIR Phase Classification for Reduced-Complexity Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dual antenna receivers in wireless communication systems face high computational complexity due to processing two streams of samples, which is exacerbated by the need for efficient interference cancellation and prefiltering in complex-valued modulation schemes like 8PSK, where existing methods like prediction error filters are complex and not suitable for all scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A method that identifies the Channel Impulse Response (CIR) as minimum, maximum, or mixed phase, and applies adaptive all-pass prefiltering only when necessary, using root identification and time-reversed processing to transform mixed and maximum phase signals to their minimum phase equivalents, thereby reducing complexity and improving performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full state MLSE is employed for 8PSK modulation, then equalization performance is improved, but computational complexity becomes excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the equalization process into two parts: MLSE for leading taps and decision feedback for remaining taps. This segmentation reduces the state space from full MLSE to reduced state MLSE, making 8PSK equalization computationally feasible while maintaining performance through the decision feedback component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs adaptive prefiltering that dynamically adjusts filter coefficients based on channel conditions. The prefilter transforms the channel impulse response to minimum phase form adaptively, optimizing the equalization performance for varying channel characteristics without requiring full state MLSE.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If reduced state equalizers are used for 8PSK, then computational complexity is reduced, but performance loss is inevitable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidequalization performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies prefiltering as a preliminary action before the reduced state equalizer. By transforming the channel to minimum phase form beforehand, the equalization task becomes easier and more accurate, reducing the performance loss typically associated with reduced state equalizers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates decision feedback in the reduced state equalizer structure. The feedback mechanism uses previously detected symbols to compensate for equalization errors, thereby improving overall performance and reducing the performance gap compared to full state MLSE.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If minimum phase prefiltering is applied, then performance loss in reduced state equalizers is reduced, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter representation of the channel by transforming it to minimum phase form. This parameter transformation concentrates energy in the leading taps, making the channel more suitable for reduced state equalization and improving performance without requiring full state MLSE.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If adaptive prefiltering is used in dual antenna receivers, then interference cancellation is improved, but computational complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the interference cancellation process across multiple antennas, applying prefiltering independently to each antenna's channel estimate. This segmentation allows parallel processing that improves interference cancellation while managing computational complexity through efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8442103B2Method and system for processing a signal in a communication system
Publication Date: 2013.05.14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US8442103B2 patent drawing
  • US8442103B2 patent drawing
  • US8442103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and transceiver for processing a signal in a communication system are provided. The method includes identifying a Channel Impulse Response (CIR) of the signal as of minimum phase, maximum phase, or mixed phase, processing the signal without performing prefiltering when the CIR is identified as minimum phase and performing all pass prefiltering of the signal when the CIR is identified as maximum phase or mixed phase. The transceiver includes a computation block and an all pass filter. The computation block identifies CIR of a signal as minimum phase, maximum phase, or mixed phase, performs root identification when the CIR of the signal is identified to be mixed phase and enables all pass filtering of the signal when the CIR of the signal is identified as mixed phase or maximum phase. The all pass filter transforms the signal to its minimum phase equivalent.