High-Voltage Circuit Breaker Actuation Timing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-voltage circuit-breakers in electricity networks face challenges in predicting optimal actuation times to minimize voltage surges and inrush currents, especially in complex and variable transmission line applications, leading to equipment damage and increased infrastructure costs.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves obtaining missing supply voltages, healthy phase/faulty phase discrimination, voltage analysis using a Prony model, and strategic closing or reclosing of the circuit-breaker based on chosen conditions to calculate and select optimum actuation times, allowing for precise control of the circuit-breaker operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional control devices are used to monitor circuit-breaker parameters and issue local instructions, then the device service life is extended and network faults are prevented, but the prediction of optimum actuation times remains inaccurate in complex transmission line applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice life of circuit-breakerVSAvoidprediction accuracy of actuation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control device continuously monitors circuit-breaker parameters (stored energy, control voltages, arc extinction medium state, ambient temperature, number of previous actuations, ageing effects, periods between actuations) and network parameters (supply voltage, line voltage, current) to provide feedback for optimizing actuation timing predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control device performs preliminary analysis of voltage waveforms and circuit-breaker state before actuation to predict and determine the optimum actuation time in advance, allowing synchronization with voltage conditions to minimize surges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If circuit-breaker actuation time is reduced to improve response speed, then productivity increases, but voltage surges and inrush currents increase causing equipment damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation speed of circuit-breakerVSAvoidvoltage surges and inrush currents
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control device synchronizes circuit-breaker actuation with the periodic voltage waveform, selecting actuation moments when voltage conditions are favorable (e.g., near zero-crossing or specific phase angles), thereby periodically minimizing harmful surges while maintaining operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The control device changes the actuation timing parameter based on real-time voltage waveform analysis, adjusting the exact moment of closure to optimize between speed and surge minimization for each specific operating condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If insertion resistances are used to reduce voltage surges, then harmful factors are minimized, but device complexity and overhead costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage surgesVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device replaces physical insertion resistances with an intelligent control system that uses voltage waveform analysis and timing optimization to minimize surges, substituting mechanical/passive components with active electronic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If comprehensive monitoring of multiple circuit-breaker and network parameters is implemented, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of actuation time predictionVSAvoidnumber of monitored parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device is designed as a multi-functional system that simultaneously monitors multiple circuit-breaker parameters (stored energy, control voltages, arc extinction medium state, ambient temperature, number of previous actuations, ageing effects, periods between actuations) and network parameters (supply voltage, line voltage, current) to provide comprehensive optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9390872B2Method for controlling a current breaking device in a high-voltage electricity network
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 ALSTOM TECH LTD
  • US9390872B2 patent drawing
  • US9390872B2 patent drawing
  • US9390872B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a current breaking device in a high-voltage electricity network is disclosed. In one aspect, the method includes, for each phase (A, B, C), obtaining missing supply voltages from an acquired supply voltage, performing healthy phase/faulty phase discrimination, conducting voltage analysis by attempted matching of a model over a signal window, choosing a strategy of simple closing or reclosing of the breaking device as a function of choice conditions, calculating a set of optimum reclosing times for each phase in accordance with the chosen strategy, and selecting an optimum time from the proposed optimum times and closing the phases of the current breaking device.