Circuit Breaker Space Allocation via Interior Wall Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Space constraints within conventional electronic residual current circuit breakers (eRCBOs) affect the optimal allocation and functionality of components, necessitating improved space management.

Innovation Solution

A compact circuit breaker design with a single pole module that includes an interior wall dividing the space into RCD and MCB sides, featuring a printed circuit board with a trip solenoid and lever mechanism for tripping, and accommodating electromagnetic, arc distinguishing, and thermal protection devices, allowing for efficient use of space and operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the housing is divided into equal or unequal sections with interior walls, then space allocation is structured and components can be organized, but the available space for each section is reduced and space utilization efficiency is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent organizationVSAvoidavailable space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The housing is divided into a first section for the RCD and a second section for the MCB pole, with each section further segmented into functional areas (current path regions, lever mechanism, trip solenoid, electromagnetic device, arc distinguishing device, thermal protection device). This segmentation allows organized component placement while optimizing space utilization within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes three-dimensional space optimization by arranging components in multiple dimensions within the housing. The interior wall creates vertical separation, while current path regions and component placements optimize horizontal and depth dimensions, achieving efficient space utilization without excessive subdivision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple protection devices (electromagnetic, arc distinguishing, thermal) are integrated into the MCB pole side, then comprehensive protection functionality is achieved, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection functionalityVSAvoidcomponent count
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple protection functions (electromagnetic, arc distinguishing, thermal) are merged into a single integrated MCB pole assembly within the housing. These devices are combined in the second section, sharing common structural support and coordination mechanisms, thereby achieving comprehensive protection while managing complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The MCB pole side is designed as a multi-functional unit that simultaneously provides electromagnetic protection, arc distinguishing, and thermal protection. This universal design allows a single component assembly to perform multiple protection functions, reducing the need for separate dedicated devices for each protection type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Length of stationary object

If the circuit breaker maintains compact dimensions (125mm height, 18mm width, 70mm depth), then installation space is minimized, but component functionality and space for necessary protection devices are constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing dimensionsVSAvoidcomponent functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Components are nested within the compact housing structure, with the interior wall creating nested sections. The trip solenoid, lever mechanism, and protection devices are arranged in nested configurations that maximize space utilization while maintaining compact external dimensions. Current path regions are nested within the available volume of each section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the dimensional parameters of the housing and internal components to achieve compact size. By carefully selecting and adjusting dimensions (125mm height, 18mm width, 70mm depth) and component placements, the design maintains reliability while minimizing overall size for installation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design optimizes space allocation, enabling effective overcurrent and short-circuit protection while maintaining compact dimensions, enhancing the functionality and performance of the circuit breaker.

Implementation Method 1

a printed circuit board with a trip solenoid and lever mechanism for tripping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentEP2242077B1Space allocation within a circuit breaker
Publication Date: 2017.08.09 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2242077B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2242077B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2242077B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A single pole module (110) of a circuit breaker (100) is disclosed. The module (110) includes a first portion (200) and a second portion (300), and an interior wall (111) separating the first portion (200) from the second portion (300). The first portion (200) includes a first section (103) receiving a circuit board (201) and a second section (105) receiving a lever mechanism (207). The second portion (300) includes a first section (106) receiving an electromagnetic protection device (306), a second section (107) receiving an arc extinguishing device (307), a third section (108) receiving a thermal protection device (308), and a fourth section (109) receiving an operating mechanism (302). The first and second sections (103, 105) of the first portion (200) occupy substantially half of the module (110) and the first, second, third and fourth sections (106, 107, 108, 109) of the second portion (300) occupy substantially half of the module (110) and the second section (105) of the first portion (200) and the third and fourth sections (108, 109) of the second portion (300) are disposed opposite each other.