Circuit Failure Mode Analysis Using Functional Primitives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current failure mode analysis in circuit design for safety-critical systems is inaccurate due to subjective and manual characterization of safety data, leading to unreliable safety metrics and functional safety verification, especially in the absence of pre-characterized data for circuit components.

Innovation Solution

The method involves identifying and extracting functional primitives of circuit design components to determine root cause logic for specific failure modes, enabling accurate failure mode distribution calculations and fault list generation, with selective granularity for improved accuracy and automated safety data management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual ad-hoc characterization of safety data is performed for every circuit component, then safety data can be obtained, but accuracy and reliability of safety metrics deteriorate due to subjectivity and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of safety dataVSAvoidprecision of safety metrics
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of safety data characterization with an automated computer-implemented system. The automated system extracts functional primitives from circuit design components and systematically determines root cause logic for failure modes, eliminating human subjectivity and error while improving both reliability and precision of safety metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables circuit components to self-characterize their safety data through automated extraction of functional primitives and root cause logic determination. Each circuit component can independently contribute its safety characteristics without requiring manual intervention, improving efficiency and consistency across the entire circuit design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If automated methods are implemented for safety data characterization, then accuracy and reliability of safety metrics improve, but device complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of safety metricsVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex safety analysis process into distinct functional primitives that can be independently extracted and analyzed. By breaking down circuit components into their fundamental functional elements, the system manages complexity through modular processing while maintaining high precision in safety metric calculation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of analysis by extracting functional primitives at the logic level rather than treating components as black boxes. This additional layer of abstraction enables more precise safety characterization without proportionally increasing physical system complexity, as the enhancement occurs in the computational/analytical domain

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If detailed root cause logic is determined for each failure mode, then accuracy of failure mode distribution calculation improves, but loss of time increases due to extensive analysis requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of failure mode distributionVSAvoidtime for safety analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary extraction of functional primitives from circuit components before conducting failure mode analysis. By pre-processing and organizing the functional building blocks in advance, the system reduces the time required for subsequent failure mode distribution calculations while maintaining detailed and accurate root cause logic determination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11630938B1Failure mode analysis for circuit design
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 CADENCE DESIGN SYST INC
  • US11630938B1 patent drawing
  • US11630938B1 patent drawing
  • US11630938B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments provide for failure mode analysis of a circuit design, which can be used as part of electronic design automation (EDA). In particular, some embodiments provide for failure mode analysis of a circuit design by determining a set of functional primitives of a circuit design component (e.g., cell at gate level) that contribute to a root cause logic for a specific failure mode.