Electronic Circuit Reliability Prediction Under Dynamic Stress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The failure rate of electronic components and circuits is difficult to predict accurately due to variations in stress and manufacturing quality, leading to unpredictable lifetimes and potential failures, which existing methods fail to account for dynamic operational conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving repeated measurements of operation parameters during circuit operation, using a reliability prediction model to calculate a reliability prediction parameter, incorporating acceleration factors based on temperature and electrical stress, and updating these calculations dynamically to improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manufacturer guarantees are based on worst-case stress scenarios, then reliability guarantee is improved, but prediction accuracy for actual operating conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability guaranteeVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic reliability prediction by continuously monitoring operation parameters (temperature, electrical stress) during actual device operation and updating the reliability prediction parameter in real-time. This transforms the static worst-case guarantee into a dynamic assessment that adapts to actual operating conditions, resolving the contradiction between providing reliable guarantees and maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where operation parameters are measured, fed into a reliability prediction model, and the resulting reliability prediction parameter is used to adjust maintenance and operational decisions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables continuous refinement of reliability predictions based on actual device behavior, improving both guarantee reliability and prediction accuracy simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If real-time monitoring of operation parameters is implemented, then prediction accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages existing multi-functional components within the electronic circuit to perform monitoring duties. The same circuitry that operates the device is utilized to measure operation parameters, and the calculation logic integrates reliability prediction into the existing control functions. This approach enables accurate real-time monitoring without adding separate dedicated monitoring systems, thereby minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic circuit performs self-monitoring and self-assessment of its own reliability by measuring its own operation parameters and calculating its own reliability prediction parameter. This self-service capability eliminates the need for external monitoring equipment and complex external analysis systems, achieving high prediction accuracy while keeping the overall system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Duration of action of stationary object

If manufacturer lifetime guarantees are extended, then customer satisfaction is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifetime guaranteeVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic adjustment of lifetime predictions based on actual operating conditions. Devices operating under lower stress conditions can achieve extended lifetime predictions, while those under higher stress are identified for earlier maintenance or replacement. This dynamic approach allows manufacturers to offer extended lifetime guarantees selectively based on actual device performance rather than applying uniform conservative estimates to all devices, thereby reducing overall costs while maintaining customer satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the reliability prediction parameter continuously based on measured operation parameters such as temperature and electrical stress. By tracking how these parameters evolve over time, the system can provide updated lifetime predictions that reflect actual device degradation patterns. This allows for more accurate and potentially extended lifetime guarantees without the need for overly conservative manufacturing standards, as the actual device performance is continuously assessed and reported.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250378248A1Method for reliability prediction and electronic circuit
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG
  • US20250378248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378248A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, a method is provided, comprising:repeatedly performing a measurement of a plurality of operation parameters of an electronic circuit during operation of the electronic circuit,for each measurement calculating, by the electronic circuit, a reliability prediction parameter of the electronic circuit based on the measurements and a reliability prediction model of the electronic circuit.