Circuit Reliability Assessment Using Failure Distribution Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing circuit reliability assessment techniques are overly conservative, leading to performance trade-offs, as they do not accurately account for the impact of component failures on overall circuit operation, particularly in the case of gate oxide breakdowns, which are not always catastrophic.

Innovation Solution

A method involving testing semiconductor structures to failure, generating a cumulative probability distribution function (CPDF) of measured parameters, and using transistor models to simulate failures, allowing for the determination of parameter threshold values and adjusted circuit area calculations to compute a more accurate reliability value that accounts for partial failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing circuit reliability assessment techniques are used, then reliability evaluation is performed, but the assessment is overly conservative leading to performance trade-offs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit reliability assessment accuracyVSAvoidcircuit performance level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the assessment parameters from binary failure/non-failure to a continuous distribution of failure effects. By modeling component failures with probability distributions and simulating their varying impacts on circuit parameters (such as delay, power consumption, and signal integrity), the assessment transitions from conservative worst-case estimates to more accurate statistical evaluations that reflect real-world variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by considering only those component failures that actually impact circuit performance below a threshold, rather than assuming all failures are catastrophic. By simulating partial failure effects and filtering out non-critical variations, the method avoids over-conservatism while maintaining reliability assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If existing circuit reliability assessment techniques are used, then reliability evaluation is performed, but the assessment does not account for varying effects of component failures on circuit operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability assessment realismVSAvoidassessment methodology complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-characterizing component failures through testing and modeling before circuit assessment. Failure modes are identified, parameter distributions are established, and impact models are developed in advance, allowing the actual reliability assessment to use these pre-computed models rather than performing complex real-time simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating simplified models that replicate the essential behavior of failed components. Instead of simulating every possible failure mode in detail, the method creates representative models of failure effects (such as parameter shifts or performance degradation patterns) that capture the essential impact on circuit operation, reducing complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20140096093A1Reliability determination taking into account effect of component failures on circuit operation
Publication Date: 2014.04.03 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20140096093A1 patent drawing
  • US20140096093A1 patent drawing
  • US20140096093A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes testing to failure a plurality of semiconductor test structures, measuring a parameter of each semiconductor test structure after experiencing a failure, and generating a cumulative probability distribution function (CPDF) of cumulative probability versus the measured parameter after failure for the plurality of semiconductor test structures. The method further includes performing simulations for a circuit having an area using a model of a transistor that mimics the failure to determine a parameter threshold value that defines a minimum acceptable performance level of the circuit, determining a cumulative probability value from the CPDF that a transistor will not have the parameter at a level below the parameter threshold value, adjusting a value of the area of the circuit based on the cumulative probability value, and computing a first reliability value based on the adjusted area value.