Circuit Tampering Detection via Differential Power Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting tampering or component failure in electronic circuits are time-consuming, highly manual, and often subjective, making them inefficient and difficult to apply to products in use, especially since they require specialized knowledge and can take tens of hours to yield results.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses observed evidence and prediction to probabilistically determine tampering or malicious behavior in circuit components by classifying output as normal or abnormal, employing differential power analysis, proper and improper parameter maps, and an intelligent adaptive alarm system with variable tolerance settings to quickly and automatically identify compromised components, and provide instructions for corrective actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual differential power analysis is used to detect tampering or component failure, then measurement precision can be achieved, but loss of time increases significantly (tens of hours required)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with an automated electronic system that uses a processor to perform differential power analysis. The system automatically compares actual power consumption measurements against expected values and identifies anomalies, eliminating the need for manual laboratory measurements and analysis while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit board incorporates self-diagnostic capabilities through the automated analysis system that continuously monitors its own power consumption characteristics. The system can autonomously detect tampering or component failures without requiring external manual intervention, enabling real-time self-verification of circuit integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If manual analysis by specially trained personnel is employed, then detection capability improves, but device complexity increases due to specialized knowledge requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidspecialized knowledge requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated analysis system as an intermediary between the circuit board and the detection process. This system includes a processor that automatically performs differential power analysis, eliminating the need for specially trained personnel to interpret complex measurements. The intermediary handles the complexity internally while providing simple automated results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the human expert system with an automated electronic analysis system that embeds the detection logic and algorithms within the circuit board itself or in connected analysis equipment, eliminating the need for specialized human knowledge while maintaining or improving detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If detailed manual laboratory measurements are performed, then measurement precision improves, but productivity decreases due to time-consuming processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidanalysis throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual laboratory measurement procedures with automated electronic measurement and analysis systems that can process multiple circuit boards simultaneously or in rapid succession. The automated system maintains measurement precision while increasing throughput by eliminating manual setup, measurement, and analysis steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated measurements and comparisons against stored expected values, quickly identifying circuits that require further attention. This preliminary action filters out normal circuits before more detailed analysis, significantly increasing overall productivity while maintaining precision for circuits that actually need investigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10670648B2Systems and methods for determining whether a circuit is operating properly
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 RAYTHEON CO
  • US10670648B2 patent drawing
  • US10670648B2 patent drawing
  • US10670648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generally discussed herein are systems, devices, and methods for determining if a circuit is acting improperly. A system can include a module to receive proper performance values of a circuit, a module to receive improper performance values of the circuit, a module to compare actual circuit input characteristics (Xa) and actual circuit output characteristics (Ya) to X, Y, D, and Z to determine if the circuit is more likely operating properly or more likely operating improperly, and an alert module to, in response to determining the circuit is operating improperly, provide an alert to personnel indicating that the circuit is operating improperly or providing one or more signals to the circuit that cause the circuit to alter its current operation.