Circulating Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming for Heavy Oil Hydrogen

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current steam reforming processes are limited in their ability to efficiently produce hydrogen from heavy oil feedstocks due to issues such as irreversible catalyst deactivation, coke formation, and sulfur poisoning, and are often capital intensive, especially when using high-temperature gasification methods.

Innovation Solution

A circulating fluidized bed process using a nickel-based catalyst mixed with alpha-alumina as a solid diluent, which allows for continuous hydrogen production without catalyst deactivation, by regenerating the catalyst with air and avoiding the introduction of nitrogen into the syngas, thus enabling the use of heavy oil feedstocks like atmospheric and vacuum tower bottoms, and pyrolysis oil.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional steam reforming is used with heavy oil feedstocks, then hydrogen production is achieved, but catalyst deactivation and coke formation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen productionVSAvoidcatalyst activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst is periodically regenerated by switching between reforming mode (producing hydrogen) and regeneration mode (burning off coke deposits). This periodic switching allows the catalyst to maintain activity over extended periods by removing accumulated carbon deposits before they cause permanent deactivation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The process changes operational parameters between two distinct modes: reforming conditions (lower temperature, hydrogen-producing reactions) and regeneration conditions (higher temperature, air-introduced combustion). This parameter switching enables the catalyst to function productively then be restored without permanent deactivation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If high-temperature gasification is used to produce hydrogen from heavy oil, then hydrogen production capability is improved, but capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen production capabilityVSAvoidcapital intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process operates at moderate temperatures during the reforming phase rather than requiring the extremely high temperatures of conventional gasification. This parameter change enables heavy oil conversion at lower capital investment while maintaining productive hydrogen generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own produced hydrogen as the reducing agent to convert metal oxides back to active catalyst form during regeneration. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external reducing agents and simplifies the overall process configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-generated harmful factors

If air is introduced for catalyst regeneration, then coke removal is achieved, but nitrogen dilutes the syngas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoke removalVSAvoidsyngas purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The regeneration function is extracted from the main reforming reactor and performed in a separate regeneration reactor. This separation allows air to be introduced for coke combustion without contaminating the hydrogen-rich syngas stream produced in the reforming reactor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The catalytic system is segmented into two distinct functional reactors: one dedicated to reforming (hydrogen production) and another to regeneration (coke removal). This segmentation enables independent optimization of each function without compromising the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If heavy oil feedstocks are processed by conventional methods, then hydrogen is produced, but sulfur poisoning occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen production from heavy oilVSAvoidcatalyst resistance to sulfur
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The periodic regeneration cycle includes high-temperature air treatment that oxidizes and removes sulfur deposits accumulated during reforming. This periodic cleaning action prevents progressive sulfur poisoning and maintains catalyst activity when processing sulfur-containing heavy oils

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The sulfur that accumulates on the catalyst during reforming is converted into a removable form through oxidative regeneration. The harmful sulfur deposits are transformed into sulfur oxides that can be gasified and removed, converting a deactivating contaminant into a manageable byproduct

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves low-cost, continuous hydrogen production with high purity, expanding the range of feedstocks that can be used and reducing capital and operating costs compared to conventional methods, while maintaining catalyst activity and avoiding nitrogen dilution in the syngas.

Implementation Method 1

A circulating fluidized bed process using a nickel-based catalyst mixed with alpha-alumina as a solid diluent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

A circulating fluidized bed process using a nickel-based catalyst mixed with alpha-alumina as a solid diluent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidisation: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 3

by regenerating the catalyst with air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

CH4+2H2O→CO2+4H2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam reforming:

Implementation Method 5

This process achieves low-cost, continuous hydrogen production with high purity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS10899973B1Process for generating high purity synthesis gas hydrogen from heavy oil or hydrocarbons
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 TDA RESEARCH INC
  • US10899973B1 patent drawing
  • US10899973B1 patent drawing
  • US10899973B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a steam reforming process for heavy oil or hydrocarbons using a circulating fluidized bed reactor, the process having a reforming step and a regeneration step, wherein the reforming step and the regeneration step comprise a fluidized reactor containing a fluidizable nickel-containing reforming catalyst and produce hydrogen as a product of the reforming bed. The invention produces high purity hydrogen in the synthesis gas product stream and avoids irreversible fouling on the catalyst.