Circulating Storage Order Allocation for Priority Picking Fulfillment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for processing picking orders are inflexible and inefficient, particularly in handling higher priority orders and ensuring rapid order fulfillment.

Innovation Solution

A central controller allocates orders to circulating storages, generates an overall list of articles per storage, and uses hanging bags for flexible article distribution, enabling preferential handling of urgent orders while checking storage contents for completeness and repurposing articles as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If articles are fixedly allocated to orders in the buffer storage, then order fulfillment is systematic and organized, but flexibility to handle higher priority orders is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in order processingVSAvoidcomplexity of allocation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic allocation of articles to orders by enabling the central controller to regularly check circulating storage contents and reallocate articles based on changing order priorities. The system transitions from static fixed allocation to dynamic reallocation, allowing articles to be repurposed for urgent orders while maintaining systematic organization through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the allocation parameter from fixed to variable by allowing the central controller to modify article assignments based on priority levels. When higher priority orders are detected, the controller reallocates articles from lower priority orders, effectively changing the allocation state parameter dynamically without physical system reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the system processes all orders systematically, then complete order fulfillment is achieved, but processing time for urgent orders increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder processing speedVSAvoidtime for urgent order fulfillment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The central controller implements continuous feedback by regularly checking the contents of circulating storage against the overall order list. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect when articles for higher priority orders are available and immediately reallocate resources, reducing waiting time for urgent orders while maintaining systematic processing of all orders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by maintaining an overall list of all articles and their locations in circulating storage in advance. This pre-organized information allows the controller to quickly identify and reallocate articles for urgent orders without delay, as the allocation data is already prepared and accessible before the priority change occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If articles are discharged only when all articles for an original order are present, then complete orders are ensured, but higher priority orders cannot be expedited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder completenessVSAvoidpriority handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The discharge condition parameter is changed from rigid (all articles must be present) to flexible (discharge when priority criteria met). The central controller evaluates multiple conditions including order completeness, priority level, and article availability in circulating storage, allowing discharge decisions to adapt based on the relative importance of different orders rather than following a single fixed rule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The order discharge process transitions from static completion-based discharge to dynamic priority-based discharge. The system continuously monitors circulating storage and can discharge articles for higher priority orders even if the original order is not fully complete, dynamically adjusting discharge timing based on real-time priority assessments while maintaining reliability through controlled reallocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12545514B2System and method for processing a multiplicity of picking orders with a plurality of articles
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 DEMATIC GMBH
  • US12545514B2 patent drawing
  • US12545514B2 patent drawing
  • US12545514B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for processing picking orders each having a plurality of articles, includes a replenishing storage, at least one reloading station connected to the replenishing storage for reloading of articles for hanging transportation, and a buffer storage connected to the reloading station with parallel circulating storages for hanging transports. A controller allocates orders to be picked to each circulating storage and generates a list and quantity of all articles per circulating storage, and supplies the articles present therein to the respective circulating storage. The controller checks each circulating storage to determine whether a) articles for the fulfilment of an original order are present, and/or b) articles for the fulfilment of another order to be treated preferentially are present, and/or c) articles for the fulfilment of another order to be treated preferentially are present in two or more circulating storages. Thereupon the articles are discharged from the respective circulating storage.