Wall Cladding Height Adjustment via Concealed Rear Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wall cladding systems face challenges in achieving uniform alignment of panel modules, with existing adjustment mechanisms often visible and accessible, which can compromise the decorative front and allow unauthorized adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A wall cladding system with height-adjustable panel elements featuring a tool attachment accessible from the side of a joint, allowing for fine height adjustments without disturbing the front panel, and incorporating securing means to prevent unintentional displacement, with the adjustment mechanism and securing elements concealed from view.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If adjustment mechanisms are made accessible for easy operation, then ease of operation is improved, but the decorative front is compromised and unauthorized adjustments become possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment mechanism accessibilityVSAvoidunauthorized adjustments and aesthetic compromise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment mechanism is extracted from the front view and relocated to the rear side of the cladding module. The tool attachment is positioned on the rear side, accessible only through the joint from the rear, separating the adjustment function from the decorative front surface. This allows easy operation from the rear while protecting the aesthetic integrity of the front.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The joint between cladding modules serves as an intermediary space that provides access to the adjustment mechanism from the rear. This intermediate access path allows tool attachment without compromising the front decorative surface, enabling adjustment operations through the joint while maintaining aesthetic integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the tool attachment is positioned on the front panel for easy access, then ease of operation is improved, but the decorative front is disturbed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool attachment accessibilityVSAvoidaesthetic integrity of front panel
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The tool attachment is extracted from the front panel and repositioned on the rear side of the cladding module. It is accessible through the joint from the rear, completely removing it from the decorative front surface while maintaining full operational accessibility from the installation side.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tool attachment accessibility is moved from the front dimension to the rear dimension of the cladding module. Instead of accessing the tool from the front, the joint provides a rear access path, effectively using the depth dimension of the module to separate the tool attachment location from the decorative front surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Shape

If adjustment mechanisms are concealed completely, then aesthetic integrity is improved, but ease of operation and maintenance becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic integrity of front panelVSAvoidadjustment mechanism accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The joint between cladding modules acts as an intermediary access channel that provides rear access to the adjustment mechanism. This allows the mechanism to be concealed from the front while remaining accessible through the joint from the rear, maintaining both aesthetic integrity and operational accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of repair

If securing means are made accessible for easy operation, then ease of repair is improved, but unauthorized adjustments become possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring means accessibilityVSAvoidprotection against unauthorized adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The securing means are extracted from the front view and positioned on the rear side of the cladding module, accessible only through the joint from the rear. This location provides easy access for authorized installation and maintenance personnel while being invisible and inaccessible from the front, preventing unauthorized adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2694753B1Wall covering system
Publication Date: 2019.09.25 KNAUF RIESSLER
  • EP2694753B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2694753B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2694753B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

For a wall covering system having a plurality of plate-shaped covering modules and a support assembly fastened to a wall, the covering modules (P11, P22,...) are retained such as to be height adjustable to a limited extent by means of adjusting means after being hooked into the support assembly, and the tool access to the adjusting means (HU, VE) is arranged in a concealed manner in gaps between adjacent covering modules (P11, P22,...).