Deep Learning Claim Analysis System for Denial Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical insurance claim processing is subjective and prone to human error, leading to inefficiencies and biases in claim analysis, as well as delays in payment due to the need for manual review and investigation.

Innovation Solution

A claim analysis system utilizing deep learning to predict payer responses to medical insurance claims, including task-specific layers to determine denial probabilities and identify contributing claim features, thereby automating the analysis and reducing human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review and investigation of claims is performed by humans, then subjective analysis and human error occur, but the system allows for human judgment and flexibility in complex cases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of claim analysisVSAvoidsubjectivity and human error in review
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual human review with an automated deep learning model that processes claims data. The model uses neural networks with embedding layers to automatically analyze claim features, predict denial probabilities, and identify contributing factors, thereby eliminating human subjectivity and error while maintaining analytical capability through computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If human reviewers analyze claims manually, then patterns can be identified through experience, but the volume of claims reviewed is insufficient to identify comprehensive patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume of claims processedVSAvoidpattern recognition capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The deep learning model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it processes high volumes of claims, identifies patterns across diverse claim types, predicts denial outcomes, and provides explanatory reasoning. The model's architecture with shared embedding layers enables it to learn universal patterns from training data and apply them across different claim scenarios, achieving both high productivity and comprehensive pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated deep learning models are used to predict payer responses, then efficiency and pattern identification improve, but the system complexity and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing efficiencyVSAvoidmodel architecture and training infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the claim analysis task into distinct functional components handled by different model elements: embedding layers for feature representation, task-specific output layers for prediction, and explanation generation components for reasoning. This segmentation allows the complex model to be developed, trained, and maintained in modular fashion, reducing the practical complexity despite the sophisticated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If manual claim review is performed, then claims can be investigated in detail, but payment delays occur while insurers investigate suspicious claims

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvestigation thoroughnessVSAvoidpayment delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The automated deep learning model enables continuous processing of claims without interruption or delay. Unlike manual review where claims queue up for human investigation, the model processes claims in real-time as they are submitted, providing immediate predictions and explanations. This continuous automated action eliminates waiting time while maintaining thorough analysis through the model's comprehensive feature evaluation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12229684B2Claim analysis with deep learning
Publication Date: 2025.02.18 AKASA INC
  • US12229684B2 patent drawing
  • US12229684B2 patent drawing
  • US12229684B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments relate to system for automatically predicting payer response to claims. In an embodiment, the system receives claim data associated with a claim. The system identifies a set of claim features of the claim data, and generates an input vector with at least a portion of the set of claim features. The system applies the input vector to a trained model. A first portion of the neural network is configured to generate an embedding representing the input vector with a lower dimensionality than the input vector. A second portion of the neural network is configured to generate a prediction of whether the claim will be denied based on the embedding. The system provides the prediction for display on a user interface of a user device. The prediction may further include denial reason codes and a response date estimation to indicate if, when, and why a claim will be denied.