Patent Claim Comparison for Portfolio Novelty Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The management of patent portfolios is complex and involves multiple stages, including decision-making on filing, prosecution, and maintenance, requiring up-to-date information on cited references and technology trends to devise effective patenting strategies.

Innovation Solution

A patent management system with tools for prosecution analytics, patent analysis, reference management, and strategic monitoring, including user interfaces and databases for managing patent portfolios, providing analytics and automated tools for data processing and visualization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If comprehensive patent portfolio management is implemented, then decision-making capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent management system is divided into distinct functional modules including patent analysis module, reference management module, prosecution analytics module, and strategic monitoring module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, making the overall complex system manageable through modular organization while providing comprehensive decision-making capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces automated data processing and analysis as intermediary functions between raw patent data and strategic decisions. Analytics tools and algorithms serve as mediators that transform complex patent information into actionable insights, reducing the cognitive load on users while maintaining comprehensive decision-making support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated analytics tools are deployed, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatent management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs automated data collection, processing, and analysis functions that operate independently without requiring manual intervention for routine tasks. The patent management system automatically monitors patent status, analyzes references, generates analytics, and provides strategic recommendations, thereby improving productivity while the automation itself manages the complexity rather than requiring human expertise for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms patent management from manual qualitative assessment to automated quantitative analysis by changing the parameters of data processing. Analytics tools process patent data using defined algorithms and metrics, converting complex qualitative patent evaluation into standardized quantitative outputs that improve productivity while maintaining systematic approach through parameter standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If up-to-date information on cited references is maintained, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereference analysis accuracyVSAvoidinformation management burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The reference management module proactively collects, organizes, and pre-processes cited reference information before it is needed for patent analysis. The system automatically maintains updated reference databases and pre-analyzes citation relationships, ensuring that when patent analysis is required, the information is already prepared and accessible, improving measurement precision while reducing the information management burden during actual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors and updates reference information through feedback loops that track changes in patent landscapes, citation patterns, and reference status. This ongoing feedback mechanism ensures that the reference database remains current and accurate, improving measurement precision while the automated feedback processes manage information updates without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12561337B2System and method for patent and prior art analysis
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 BLACK HILLS IP HLDG LLC
  • US12561337B2 patent drawing
  • US12561337B2 patent drawing
  • US12561337B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods for analyzing patents and prior art in a patent management system. In an example embodiment, a computer-implemented method of determining a potential point of novelty for an identified patent comprises retrieving at least one independent claim of the patent in the claim form as issued; retrieving at least one independent claim of the patent in the claim form as published; and automatically comparing the issued claim to the published claim by identifying unique keywords present in the issued claim but not present in the published claim and flagging the unique keywords to a user.