Claim Processing Segmentation by Customer History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for processing product claims do not automatically consider customer claim history or improve processing efficiency, nor do they provide information for supply chain management or reduce claim-related costs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that process claims based on customer average values, determining if they exceed or fall below threshold values, and automatically handle claims accordingly, including further investigation and improvement plans for high-frequency claimants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated processing is implemented for all claims, then processing efficiency is improved, but accuracy and reliability deteriorate due to inability to consider customer claim history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing efficiencyVSAvoidclaim processing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments claim processing into multiple pathways based on customer claim history. High-frequency claimants (those exceeding a threshold number of claims) are routed to manual review processes, while low-frequency claimants are processed automatically. This segmentation allows automated processing to improve efficiency for suitable cases while maintaining human oversight for complex or problematic cases, thus resolving the contradiction between efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If manual review is used for all claims, then accuracy is improved, but processing time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing accuracyVSAvoidclaim processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying manual review to all claims (excessive action), the system applies manual review only partially - specifically to high-frequency claimants who pose higher risk. The majority of claims from low-frequency claimants are processed automatically, reducing overall processing time and costs while maintaining sufficient accuracy through targeted manual intervention where most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of energy

If automated processing is implemented, then processing costs are reduced, but ability to provide improvement plans deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing costsVSAvoidsupply chain improvement information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that analyze claim patterns and generate actionable insights. When high-frequency claimants are identified through automated processing, the system provides feedback in the form of improvement plans and notifications to address underlying supply chain issues. This feedback loop ensures that automated cost-effective processing does not lose the ability to provide valuable improvement information, as the automated system itself generates and delivers this feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8150722B2System and method for automated processing of claims
Publication Date: 2012.04.03 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US8150722B2 patent drawing
  • US8150722B2 patent drawing
  • US8150722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are disclosed that provide for processing claims. The system and method include receiving a claim from a customer and determining if a customer average value associated with the customer is greater than or equal to a threshold value. The system and method also include processing the claim when the customer average value is less than the threshold value and determining if the claim meets one or more predetermined parameters when the customer average value is greater than or equal to the threshold value. In addition, the system and method include processing the claim when the claim meets the one or more predetermined parameters and forwarding the claim for further investigation when the claim fails to meet the one or more predetermined parameters and the customer average value is greater than or equal to the threshold value.