Unified Claims Case Management for Multi-Policy Adjudication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insurance claim processing for multiple policies is fragmented, paper-intensive, and prone to errors, duplication, and increased interaction with outside entities, leading to administrative burdens and opportunities for fraud, especially when handling events like death or disability claims across different policies.

Innovation Solution

A hierarchical claims processing system that manages claims at a claim management case level, policy level, and coverage level, allowing for unified processing and adjudication of multiple policies, with features like a policy portfolio view and designee management, to streamline information requirements and payments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If claims are processed on a policy-by-policy basis, then each policy can be handled according to its specific terms and conditions, but the claims administration process becomes fragmented and paper-intensive with duplication of efforts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy-specific processingVSAvoidclaims administration process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple policy-level claim processes into a single unified claims administration system. The system consolidates information requirements, document collection, and correspondence generation across multiple policies into one integrated workflow, eliminating duplication while maintaining policy-specific processing capabilities through a centralized hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The claims administration system is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple policies simultaneously. It provides multi-functional capabilities to manage diverse policy types (life insurance, annuity, disability, health) through a single system interface, allowing the same system to adapt to different policy requirements without requiring separate processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple sets of information requirements are generated for each policy, then each policy's specific documentation needs are met, but duplication occurs and additional opportunities for error and fraud arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocumentation accuracyVSAvoidinformation duplication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges information requirements across multiple policies into a unified set of documentation requests. By consolidating duplicate requirements (such as a single death certificate for multiple policies), the system reduces information duplication and associated errors while maintaining the ability to track which documents satisfy which policy requirements through its hierarchical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple checks are issued to beneficiaries for different policies, then each policy's benefit is paid correctly, but the process becomes more time-consuming and administratively burdensome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment accuracyVSAvoidclaims processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the payment issuance process for multiple policies into a coordinated workflow. It can consolidate payments to the same beneficiary across multiple policies into a single transaction when appropriate, or coordinate multiple payments through a unified system that tracks and manages all payment activities, reducing administrative time while maintaining accurate payment distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If additional interaction is required with outside persons and entities for each policy, then specific policy requirements are fulfilled, but the insured or insured family members bear additional burdens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy requirement fulfillmentVSAvoidinsured interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges correspondence and communication requirements across multiple policies into unified interactions with outside entities and the insured. It consolidates requests for the same information (such as a single death certificate request) into one communication, reducing the burden on insured family members while still fulfilling all necessary policy requirements through coordinated information gathering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8010390B2Claims processing of information requirements
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP
  • US8010390B2 patent drawing
  • US8010390B2 patent drawing
  • US8010390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for processing claims. A claim management case is created for an insured in response to a notice of a claim. One or more insurance policies covering the insured are associated with the claim management case. At least one process is performed at a claim management case level to fulfill an information requirement that applies to at least two of the insurance policies associated with the claim management case. Claims are adjudicated under the one or more of the insurance policies covering the insured.