Claims Validation System for Healthcare Reimbursement Rule Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for claim processing in healthcare reimbursement lack comprehensive validation of rule changes, leading to potential cash flow delays and inefficiencies due to incomplete or incorrectly formatted claims, as they fail to assess the impact of rule changes on claim data effectively.

Innovation Solution

A Claims Validation System that evaluates the effect of changing claim generation rules by comparing the results of applying different rule sets to claim data, providing a visual indication of changes and isolating the validation process from production systems to ensure accurate and complete reimbursement data processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If format certification verification is used to validate claim transaction processing rules, then format compliance is improved, but the ability to assess the effect of processing rule changes on claim data is worsened because format certification does not perform sophisticated reimbursement calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformat complianceVSAvoidreimbursement calculation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is divided into separate functional modules: a format certification module that verifies claim format compliance, and a reimbursement calculation module that performs sophisticated financial calculations. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in its specific function without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between format compliance and reimbursement calculation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary validation layer that sits between the format certification process and the reimbursement calculation process. This intermediary layer integrates both format verification and reimbursement calculation capabilities, allowing the system to maintain format compliance while simultaneously assessing the financial impact of rule changes on claim data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If payer organization specific rule changes are implemented to customize claim transaction forms, then adaptability to payer requirements is improved, but the complexity of claim processing is worsened leading to cash flow delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayer requirement customizationVSAvoidclaim processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system performs preliminary testing and validation of claim processing rules before they are implemented in the production environment. By pre-validating rules against test claim data and comparing results against expected outcomes, the system identifies and corrects errors before they cause cash flow delays, thereby reducing the complexity burden during actual implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor claim processing results and provide real-time validation feedback on rule changes. This feedback loop allows the system to detect when rule changes cause processing errors or cash flow delays and automatically adjust or reject problematic rules, simplifying the overall processing complexity while maintaining adaptability to payer requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If claim processing rules are changed to correct billing programs, then billing accuracy is improved, but the time required for validation and testing is worsened causing cash flow delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling accuracyVSAvoidvalidation and testing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system creates copies of claim data and processing rules in an isolated test environment, separate from the production billing system. By working with copies rather than actual production data, the system can perform extensive validation and testing of rule changes without delaying actual billing operations. The validated rules are then transferred to production, ensuring billing accuracy while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs all validation and testing of billing program corrections in advance, before the corrected rules are applied to actual billing. By pre-validating rules using test claim data and comparing results against expected outcomes, the system ensures billing accuracy is achieved without introducing time delays to the actual billing process, as the validation work is completed beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10657612B2Claim processing validation system
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US10657612B2 patent drawing
  • US10657612B2 patent drawing
  • US10657612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system evaluates processing rules used for processing claim data related to reimbursement for provision of healthcare to a patient by specific payer organizations. The system includes at least one repository of information including first claim data. The first claim data processing rules and associated output data comprise first claim result information derived by applying the first claim data processing rules to the first claim data. The system also includes a source of a second claim data processing rule and a rules processor for applying the second claim data processing rule to the first claim data in deriving second claim result information corresponding to the first claim result information. A comparator compares the second claim result information with the first claim result information to identify changed result data elements and associated data fields in a claim form used in obtaining reimbursement in response to a claim. An output processor provides data representing a visual display image highlighting data fields associated with the changed result data elements.