Clamping Disc Freewheel Locking for Power-Loss Grip Holding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking mechanisms in orthopedic devices, such as upper extremity prostheses, struggle to maintain gripping force after power loss without continuous energy input and often require complex designs that are costly and difficult to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A clamping roller locking mechanism with asymmetrical clamping discs having freewheel and locking sides positioned differently for each disc, allowing selective rotation direction control through drive and output projections, using an odd number of discs and recesses for adjustable locking force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional freewheel mechanism is used to maintain gripping force after power loss, then the locking function is achieved, but the device complexity increases and manufacturing becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking functionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into multiple independent clamping discs (at least three) with recesses and clamping rollers, where each disc segment independently contributes to the locking function. This segmentation allows the complex locking behavior to be achieved through simple, repeatable modular units rather than a single complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamping discs feature asymmetrical recesses with distinct freewheel sides and locking sides. The freewheel side has a larger surface area allowing free rotation, while the locking side has a smaller surface area that engages with the housing to prevent rotation. This asymmetry enables the freewheel/locking dual function without additional complex components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Force

If a wrap spring locking mechanism is used to lock the drive train against external forces, then the locking force is achieved, but the device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking forceVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping rollers automatically perform the locking function without requiring external actuation or complex control systems. When external forces are applied to the output shaft, the clamping rollers are forced into the locking sides of the recesses, self-activating the locking mechanism. This eliminates the need for wrap springs or other active locking components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If multiple identical clamping discs are used with uniform recess positions, then the manufacturing is simplified, but the locking force cannot be scaled effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidlocking force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping discs are designed with different local configurations - specifically, the recesses are positioned at different angular locations on different discs. This allows each disc to contribute differently to the overall locking force, enabling scalable locking capability while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing of individual disc components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Speed

If the recesses are made large enough to prevent clamping roller contact with the housing, then free rotation is enabled, but the locking function is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation speedVSAvoidlocking function
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The recesses are designed with asymmetrical dimensions: the freewheel side has a larger surface area that prevents clamping roller contact with the housing, enabling free rotation. The locking side has a smaller surface area that allows the clamping roller to contact the housing, enabling the locking function. This asymmetry resolves the contradiction between free rotation and locking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, energy-saving operation by maintaining gripping force without continuous power and simplifies manufacturing with fewer components, ensuring free rotation when driven and locking when externally torqued.

Implementation Method 1

the clamping roller is clamped between the clamping disc and the housing... rotation of the clamping disc relative to the housing is not possible

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

They have a freewheel side large enough to prevent a clamping roller from coming into contact with the housing, and a locking side small enough to allow a clamping roller to come into contact with the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometry: Geometry

Data Source

PatentEP3678603B1Freewheel clutch
Publication Date: 2025.09.24 OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE PROD GMBH
  • EP3678603B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3678603B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3678603B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a jamming roller lock comprising a housing (22) and at least two, preferably three clamping disks (2), which are arranged in the housing (22) in rotatable fashion and each have at least one recess (4), in which a jamming roller (20) is situated, at least one driving projection (12) and at least one driven projection (14), wherein the clamping disks (1) are arranged and embodied in such a way that a rotation of the clamping disks (2) is possible by driving the driving projections (12) and a rotation of the clamping disks (2) is prevented when driving the driven projections (14).