Clamshell Overcap with Living Hinge for Tamper-Indicating Electronic Tag

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing overcaps for rotatable bottle caps are not cost-effective to manufacture and assemble, and they do not provide a clear indication when the cap has been removed, compromising the security benefits of electronic tags.

Innovation Solution

A one-piece, clamshell-style overcap with a living hinge and snap-fit mechanism that supports an electronic tag, preventing unauthorized cap removal while allowing easy assembly and indication of tampering, which can be removed post-purchase by cutting the thinned area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a two-piece overcap design is used to support an electronic tag on a bottle cap, then the security function is achieved, but the manufacturing and assembly cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity functionVSAvoidmanufacturing and assembly cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into a single integrated overcap structure that simultaneously supports the electronic tag, provides tamper indication, and secures the bottle cap. This one-piece design eliminates the need for separate components, reducing manufacturing complexity and assembly costs while maintaining all security functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The overcap is designed as a multi-functional component that performs multiple roles: it serves as a mounting structure for the electronic tag, provides visual tamper indication through its breakable property, and mechanically secures the bottle cap to the container. This universal design consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the overcap is made secure and difficult to remove, then theft prevention is improved, but post-purchase usability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidpost-purchase usability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The overcap incorporates a thinned section that changes its structural parameter from strong to weak at a specific location. This allows the cap to be securely attached during transport and display, then easily removed by the consumer after purchase by applying minimal force to break the thinned section, resolving the contradiction between security and usability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The overcap is pre-designed with a predetermined break point (thinned section) that anticipates the need for removal. This preliminary structural preparation allows the cap to function as a secure restraint during the product lifecycle, then transition to an easily removable state for consumer use without requiring tools or complex actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9505529B2Overcap for supporting an electronic tag to a bottle cap
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 B&G INT PROD LTD
  • US9505529B2 patent drawing
  • US9505529B2 patent drawing
  • US9505529B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An overcap is provided for placement on a cap for a container. The overcap includes a pair of mating components separated by a hinge. Interlocking means is provided for securing the components together about the cap. The interlocking means couples the components for rotation about the cap without causing removable rotation of the cap and preventing non-destructible detachment of the components. The components define a lip for positioning beneath the cap for preventing removal of the overcap therefrom without destructible detachment of the components. The overcap supports an electronic tag therein. The mating components of the overcap include a severable location for removing the overcap from the cap.