Class D Amplifier Power Stage Control for Low Idle Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Class D amplifiers face a design challenge in finding a balance between maximum audio output power and minimum idle dissipation, as increasing the size of power transistors to minimize on-resistance leads to increased idle dissipation, reducing efficiency and battery life in battery-powered devices.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic power stage control system that adjusts the size of the amplification stage based on the input signal strength, using a comparator and power stage control circuit to enable only the necessary number of power stages, with a decaying signal to prevent premature disabling and phase mismatch issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the size of power transistors is increased to minimize on-resistance, then audio output power is improved, but idle dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio output powerVSAvoididle dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the power stage configuration adaptable rather than fixed. Multiple power stages with different transistor sizes are implemented, and a control circuit dynamically selects which stages to enable based on the input signal level. This allows the amplifier to transition from a static design to a dynamic one where the power stage characteristics change according to operating conditions, resolving the contradiction between maximizing output power and minimizing idle dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of power stage configuration (number of enabled stages, transistor sizing) based on signal level conditions. The control circuit monitors input signal characteristics and adjusts which power stages are active, effectively changing the electrical parameters of the amplification path. This parameter adaptation allows optimal matching between signal requirements and power stage capabilities, eliminating the need for a fixed oversized design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If the size of power transistors is increased to minimize on-resistance, then signal amplification is improved, but efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal amplificationVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the power stage configuration to match signal requirements. When high signal levels require maximum amplification, larger power stages are enabled. When signal levels are low, smaller power stages suffice, reducing energy consumption. This dynamic adaptation resolves the efficiency-amplification contradiction by ensuring amplification capacity matches actual signal needs rather than always operating at maximum capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The power amplification function is segmented into multiple independent power stages with different transistor sizes. Each stage can be independently enabled or disabled based on signal level requirements. This segmentation allows the system to use only the necessary amplification capacity for each signal condition, avoiding the energy waste inherent in always using the largest possible transistors for all signal levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Power

If the size of power transistors is increased to minimize on-resistance, then maximum audio output power is improved, but battery life is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum audio output powerVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The amplifier dynamically adapts its power consumption characteristics to match the actual audio signal requirements. During low-volume playback or idle conditions, smaller power stages are used, significantly reducing current draw and extending battery life. When maximum volume is required, the full power stages are activated to deliver the necessary output power. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction between having maximum power availability and achieving long battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by enabling only the necessary number of power stages based on signal level requirements rather than always operating at full capacity. The control circuit determines the minimum required amplification and activates only those power stages needed to handle the current signal, avoiding the excessive energy consumption that would occur if all power stages were always enabled, thereby extending battery life while maintaining maximum output capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8861748B2Amplifier and amplifier control method
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 NXP BV
  • US8861748B2 patent drawing
  • US8861748B2 patent drawing
  • US8861748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a class D amplifier comprising a modulation stage having a first input for receiving an input signal and an output for producing a modulated version of the input signal; a plurality of power stages, each power stage being responsive to said modulation stage and comprising a first switch and a second switch coupled in series between a first voltage source and a second voltage source, each power stage comprising an output node between the first switch and the second switch; and a power stage control circuit for measuring the input signal level and enabling a selected number of the power stages as a function of the measured input signal level. A method for controlling such a class D amplifier is also disclosed.